2013
DOI: 10.1177/194008291300600109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat and Human Factors Associated with White-Tailed Deer Density in the Tropical Dry Forest of Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Biosphere Reserve, Mexico

Abstract: The main objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between population densities of the white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus and certain habitat and human characteristics in the tropical dry forest of the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan Biosphere Reserve (TCBR), Mexico. To estimate population density and characterize the habitat, we established 32 strip transects (500 x 2 m) at four different locations in the TCBR from May to June during the dry season of 2010. Principal component analyses were used to ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…within their premises. Vegetation was characterized using the same protocol as in previous studies Ramos-Robles et al 2013;Barrera-Salazar et al 2015). Basically, eight 500-m transects were set in each location, with 11 sampling points separated by 50 m between them in each location, for a total of 440 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…within their premises. Vegetation was characterized using the same protocol as in previous studies Ramos-Robles et al 2013;Barrera-Salazar et al 2015). Basically, eight 500-m transects were set in each location, with 11 sampling points separated by 50 m between them in each location, for a total of 440 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, white-tailed deer populations are affected by poaching, irrational use, habitat disruption, competition for resources with domestic livestock, and incidence of parasites (Ortega-Santos et al 2011). A proper utilization of this species requires estimating population density and its relationship with different features of the habitat, vegetation and landscape, among others (Ortiz-Martinez et al 2005;López-Tellez et al 2007;Medina-Torres et al 2008;Mandujano et al 2013;Ramos-Robles et al 2013;BarreraSalazar et al 2015;García-Marmolejo et al 2015). Unlike other regions of the country -for example the northeast (Villarreal 1999), La Michilía in Durango (Galindo-Leal and Weber 1998), the Mixteca Poblana (Villarreal-Espino 2006), and various regions of the state of Oaxaca (Mandujano 2016) -management of the white-tailed deer is not an extensive practice in the state of Veracruz; hence, a larger number of studies are required for its populations (Mandujano 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered it important to include the former since it is related to deer strategy for escaping from predators [13,50,51]. Regarding the latter, it is well known that human presence and activity have a negative effect on many species, which has been described for the white-tailed deer in Mexico by some authors [17,18,52]. However, while it is possible to note certain trends in the relationship between these variables and deer density, this was not found to be significant in either of the two study regions.…”
Section: Explicative Environmental Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we analyzed whether differences in deer density and habitat variables existed between the two study regions. This evaluation is important because studies conducted in Mexico on the effects of different habitat variables on the density or abundance of the white-tailed deer [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] autocorrelation [19]. Understanding and including spatial autocorrelation can reveal more accurately the relationship between habitat and white-tailed deer population, with important repercussions for conservation and management of the white-tailed deer in Mexico.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mexico, the method has been used for the mule deer [13,14] and the white-tailed deer, mainly in temperate [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and tropical dry [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] forests. The method also serves to estimate the population density of various species of leporids [30][31][32][33][34], kangaroos [35][36][37][38][39], elephants [40] and marmots [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%