2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-005-5814-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haag’s Theorem and its Implications for the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory

Abstract: Although the philosophical literature on the foundations of quantum …eld theory recognizes the importance of Haag's theorem, it does not provide a clear discussion of the meaning of this theorem. The goal of this paper is to make up for this de…cit. In particular, it aims to set out the implications of Haag's theorem for scattering theory, the interaction picture, the use of non-Fock representations in describing interacting …elds, and the choice among the plethora of the unitarily inequivalent representations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only with the non factual 3+1 splitting of Minkowski space-time and the non factual definition of the global Poincare' generators of an isolated system is it possible define the instantaneous 3-spaces where to give the Cauchy data. In this way, at least at the classical level, it is possible to avoid the Haag theorem [52] preventing the existence of interpolating fields as shown in paper I. 27 For such projectors there is Malament's theorem [48] saying that the requirements of localizability, translation covariance, energy bounded below and microcausality imply that there is no chance that a particle will be detected in any local region.…”
Section: Quantum Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only with the non factual 3+1 splitting of Minkowski space-time and the non factual definition of the global Poincare' generators of an isolated system is it possible define the instantaneous 3-spaces where to give the Cauchy data. In this way, at least at the classical level, it is possible to avoid the Haag theorem [52] preventing the existence of interpolating fields as shown in paper I. 27 For such projectors there is Malament's theorem [48] saying that the requirements of localizability, translation covariance, energy bounded below and microcausality imply that there is no chance that a particle will be detected in any local region.…”
Section: Quantum Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Fraser (2008) convincingly argues that the Fock space representation is in general and strictly speaking only available for free, non-interacting QFT systems; central to her argument is the fact that free and interacting QFT systems involve unitarily inequivalent representations (this can also be seen as a consequence of Haag's theorem, see Earman and Fraser 2006). So, there is in general no Fock space representation for a QFT with interactions-that is, a realistic QFT.…”
Section: Equivalent Difficulties For Particle and Field Primitive Ontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has to be contrasted with QED, where we must consider only the S matrix between IN and OUT free fields and not the interpolating fields due to the Haag theorem, saying that the interaction picture does not exist [16,17] and that there is no unitary transformation from the asymptotic IN and OUT states of the radiation field to interpolating states of the general (non radiation) electro-magnetic field. See the end of Section III.…”
Section: The Need Of This Formulation Comes From At Least Two Directimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B) As shown in Refs. [11], where the Møller world-tube was introduced in connection with the Møller center of energy R µ (τ ), an extended rotating relativistic isolated system with the material radius smaller than its intrinsic radius ρ one has: i) its peripheral rotation velocity can exceed the velocity of light; ii) its classical energy density cannot be positive definite everywhere in every frame 17 . Therefore the Møller radius ρ is also a remnant of the energy conditions of general relativity in flat Minkowski space-time [7].…”
Section: F the Møller Radius And The Comparison With Other Approachementioning
confidence: 99%