2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H2S sensing material Pt-WO3 nanorods with excellent comprehensive performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our SnO 2 –NiO nanopattern also shows among the best performance in terms of sensitivity, speed, and detection range when compared with WO 3 -based H 2 S sensor (Table S1). ,, Finally, we performed the economic evaluation of top-down-based sensor at the commercial level, and it showed approximately $4.24/sensor in a 8 in. wafer-scale fabrication process (Supplementary Note 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our SnO 2 –NiO nanopattern also shows among the best performance in terms of sensitivity, speed, and detection range when compared with WO 3 -based H 2 S sensor (Table S1). ,, Finally, we performed the economic evaluation of top-down-based sensor at the commercial level, and it showed approximately $4.24/sensor in a 8 in. wafer-scale fabrication process (Supplementary Note 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pt-decorated WO 3 sensors are also utilized for effectively detecting H 2 S gas. Yao et al [ 112 ] synthesized Pt-decorated WO 3 nanorods hydrothermal and chemical reduction methods. The response of the 0.2 at% Pt-decorated WO 3 sensor was 1,638 towards 10 ppm H 2 S at 200 °C, with the short response/recovery time of 42/37 s, respectively.…”
Section: Single Noble Metal-decorated Smos-based Gas Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, large quantities of studies are focused on gas sensors based on metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) or transition metal salts for their advantages of low cost, facile preparation, and high response. Among them, owing to their immediately reaction, high response/selectivity, and low detection limit toward H 2 S, copper oxides (CuO, Cu 2 O, Cu x O) or salts have obtained great attention in the field of H 2 S detection, which can be attributed to the formation of a conductive copper sulfide (CuS) phase after H 2 S exposure. However, owing to the formation of CuS that is relatively stable in an ambient environment at room temperature (RT), most of the reported copper oxide/salt-based H 2 S sensors unavoidably suffer from the poisoning effect, resulting in the irreversible recovery behavior. , To overcome this shortcoming, multiple strategies are implemented through a heat-assisted method during the recovery period, ,, nanosize p–n junction formation, , and UV radiation treatment, which are either synthesis-uncontrollable or energy-guzzling to restrict their implementation potential in sensor networks. Inspired by the facilitated corrosion of CuS under the moisture environment with acid/oxygen, designing copper salt sensing materials combined with other functional materials that can provide an acidic environment is another ideal and promising strategy for fabricating a recoverable, low-cost, and low-power consumption H 2 S sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%