2015
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2015.1102972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hperformance controller parameterisation of linear switching plants under uncontrolled switching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coupled Riccati inequalities‐based controller parameterisation problem given in Theorem 1 is transferred equivalently to LMI‐based optimisation problem in Theorem 3. The determination of the minimal weighted L2 gain γ with respect to given μ1 and λ0>0 can be formulated and solved as an LMI optimisation problem: right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptminγ,normals.normalt.(13),(14),(20)(22). Remark 4 In particular, just as introduced in [35], when switching is uncontrolled, namely governed by some arbitrary switching rule, a common Lyapunov function is usually used to guarantee the stability or control performance, i.e. Xi=X¯ and Zfalse¯i=Z¯.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coupled Riccati inequalities‐based controller parameterisation problem given in Theorem 1 is transferred equivalently to LMI‐based optimisation problem in Theorem 3. The determination of the minimal weighted L2 gain γ with respect to given μ1 and λ0>0 can be formulated and solved as an LMI optimisation problem: right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptminγ,normals.normalt.(13),(14),(20)(22). Remark 4 In particular, just as introduced in [35], when switching is uncontrolled, namely governed by some arbitrary switching rule, a common Lyapunov function is usually used to guarantee the stability or control performance, i.e. Xi=X¯ and Zfalse¯i=Z¯.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is known, the regular H problem can be solved by the famous Riccati equation‐based algorithm [34], which has also provided a parameterisation of all possible stabilising controllers guaranteeing a bound of H performance of the closed‐loop system. Based on Riccati inequalities, the H controller parameterisation of linear switching plants was presented under uncontrolled switching in [35]. Since only one constant Lyapunov function is adopted for the controller parameterisation, compared with the MLFs‐based method, the result is relatively conservative [36, 37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%