2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5459-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H-reflex modulation preceding changes in soleus EMG activity during balance perturbation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduced H-reflex amplitudes in response to threatening scenarios is consistent with previous reports. Subjects have exhibited weaker H-reflex amplitudes in response to an increased risk ( Llewellyn et al, 1990 ; Horslen et al, 2013 ; Miranda et al, 2019 ) or consequence ( Sibley et al, 2007 ; Horslen et al, 2013 ) of a fall, as well as during alternative scenarios stimulating sympathetic arousal ( Kamibayashi et al, 2009 ; Tanaka, 2015 ). This suggests an inhibitory response at the spinal level that may be facilitated by descending commands from cortical or supraspinal structures ( Llewellyn et al, 1990 ; Adkin et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced H-reflex amplitudes in response to threatening scenarios is consistent with previous reports. Subjects have exhibited weaker H-reflex amplitudes in response to an increased risk ( Llewellyn et al, 1990 ; Horslen et al, 2013 ; Miranda et al, 2019 ) or consequence ( Sibley et al, 2007 ; Horslen et al, 2013 ) of a fall, as well as during alternative scenarios stimulating sympathetic arousal ( Kamibayashi et al, 2009 ; Tanaka, 2015 ). This suggests an inhibitory response at the spinal level that may be facilitated by descending commands from cortical or supraspinal structures ( Llewellyn et al, 1990 ; Adkin et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SOL H-reflex and V-wave responses were generated at 4 different latencies: 40, 70, 100 and 130 ms from the beginning of the ankle movement. The latencies were chosen according to literature and to coincide with short latency (SLR; 30–50 ms) (Corden et al 2000 ), medium latency (MLR; 65–100 ms), long latency (LLR; ≥ 100 ms) (Miranda et al 2019 ) and voluntary responses (Taube et al 2008c ). For each latency, a set of 16 perturbations (8 anterior and 8 posterior perturbations) was performed in random order with 6–12 s intervals and a 2-min sitting break was conducted after every third set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both legs were evaluated. We stimulated the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa using a 1-ms single-pulse monopolar electrical stimulation (constant-current Digitimer DS7, Digitimer Ltd HK; details provided in [ 23 ]). An H-reflex and muscular (M) response recruitment curve was constructed for all participants, without any contraction of the SOL muscle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%