H. J. Jackson's and G. Whalley's <i>Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Marginalia IV</i>

Perry, Seamus

doi:10.3366/rom.2001.7.1.120

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An article in the student newspaper Varsity criticizing the new buildings being erected by Cambridge colleges was headed 'The Pseudomania'. 21 In spring 1956, members of the student 'Group for Architecture and Planning' demanded to see the Dykes Bower design. When access was refused, they circulated photographs of the model around the college 'coupled with words of protest'.…”

Section: Queens' College and The Commissionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building on the Backs: Basil Spence, Queens’ College Cambridge and University Architecture at Mid-Century

Campbell¹

2011

Architectural History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Higher Education in Britain expanded dramatically during the 1950s and 1960s. The trigger for growth was the Barlow Report of 1946, which recommended an immediate doubling of the number of science students and an increase in the total number of student places, of which there had been c. 50,000 in 1939, to 70,000 by 1950 and 90,000 by 1955. The 1963 Robbins Report continued and accelerated this expansionist policy, proposing that half a million student places be created by 1980. In the event, although funding was less generous than Barlow had recommended, the numbers achieved were far greater, and 85,000 students were in Higher Education by 1950. The impetus for this growth, which included the foundation of seven new universities (the so-called ‘Shakespearean Seven’) and the enlargement of existing institutions, stemmed from an ambitious vision of the role of universities after the Second World War. Higher Education, and particularly scientific training, was seen as one way to maintain Britain’s position on the world stage. Equally important was the principle of widening access, and a concern to broaden the social base of university education found expression in a range of new approaches to design. Within this context, the universities of Oxford and Cambridge also witnessed significant expansion, but in a very particular way and with distinctive results on account of these universities’ collegiate structure. As elsewhere, buildings at Oxbridge for teaching and research were dependent on finance from the University Grants Committee, but the semi-autonomous colleges could draw on their own (sometimes considerable) resources when it came to building. Furthermore, college dons could exercise significantly more influence over the choice of architect than was possible elsewhere. The colleges of Oxford and Cambridge therefore provided an important environment in which new architectural ideas could be explored. An early contribution to the debate was made by the Erasmus Building, a residential block at Queens’ College, Cambridge, designed by Basil Spence in 1958 (Fig. 1). Although the history of Spence’s design is inextricably bound up with its Cambridge context, as an attempt to reformulate the collegiate ideal it also offers a foretaste of the debates that shaped the new universities in the decade that followed.

show abstract

Section: Queens' College and The Commissionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building on the Backs: Basil Spence, Queens’ College Cambridge and University Architecture at Mid-Century

Campbell¹

2011

Architectural History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

H. J. Jackson's and G. Whalley's Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Marginalia IV

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Building on the Backs: Basil Spence, Queens’ College Cambridge and University Architecture at Mid-Century

Building on the Backs: Basil Spence, Queens’ College Cambridge and University Architecture at Mid-Century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About