2018
DOI: 10.1101/312298
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

h-channels contribute to divergent electrophysiological properties of supragranular pyramidal neurons in human versus mouse cerebral cortex

Abstract: 24Gene expression studies suggest that differential ion channel expression 25 contributes to differences in rodent versus human neuronal physiology. We 26 tested whether h-channels more prominently contribute to the physiological 27 properties of human compared to mouse supragranular pyramidal neurons. 28Single cell/nucleus RNA sequencing revealed ubiquitous HCN1-subunit 29 expression in excitatory neurons in human, but not mouse supragranular layers. 30Using patch-clamp recordings, we found stronger h-channel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To help put these associations in context, microglial contamination explained 5.2% of the cell-to-cell variation in input resistance values among human FREM3 pyramidal cells. However, this value is similar to the variance in input resistance explained by the depth of the recorded neuron from the pial surface, 5.1%, noted previously to be a major biological factor distinguishing human superficial pyramidal cells from one another (Berg et al, 2021; Kalmbach et al, 2018; Moradi Chameh et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To help put these associations in context, microglial contamination explained 5.2% of the cell-to-cell variation in input resistance values among human FREM3 pyramidal cells. However, this value is similar to the variance in input resistance explained by the depth of the recorded neuron from the pial surface, 5.1%, noted previously to be a major biological factor distinguishing human superficial pyramidal cells from one another (Berg et al, 2021; Kalmbach et al, 2018; Moradi Chameh et al, 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, the more contaminated cell had a lower input resistance (96 vs 167 MOhms), greater rheobase (110 vs 70 pA), a more depolarized resting membrane potential (-67.8 vs -70.6 mV), and more depolarized minimum voltage following an action potential (i.e., AP trough voltage, -42.8 vs -45.9 mV) than the less contaminated cell, among other differences. We note that these differences, while striking, are within the expected ranges of variability for these cells (Kalmbach et al, 2018;Moradi Chameh et al, 2021) and that the original electrophysiological datasets have undergone strict quality control (Berg et al, 2021). Across human FREM3 pyramidal cells, we also saw that higher microglial contamination scores were associated with lower input resistances (Figure 4A, Pearson's R = -0.22 , p = 0.011) and more depolarized action potential through voltages (Figure 4B, left, Pearson's R = 0.17, p = 0.047).…”
Section: Microglial Contamination Is Associated With Alterations In I...supporting
confidence: 74%
“…A major evolutionary feature of human cortical architecture is the expansion of supragranular layers compared to other mammals, and morphological and physiological properties of pyramidal neurons vary across layers 2 and 3 of human temporal cortex 40,41 . In that light, it was surprising to find only three main excitatory clusters in human cortical layers 2 and 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the density of h-channels on the dendrites of layer 5 cortical pyramidal cells increases with distance on the apical trunk from the soma (Harnett et al, 2015; Kole et al, 2006), mirroring the smooth increase in 1/f slope from deep to superficial cortex. Additionally, human supragranular cells exhibit higher densities of h-channels when compared to rodents (Beaulieu-Laroche et al, 2018; Kalmbach et al, 2018); this may explain why the correlation between 1/f slope and depth was stronger in primates than mice. Alternatively, our effects could be due to biophysical differences across cortical layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%