2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2315-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gyrodactylus Salaris Malmberg, 1957 (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of G. salaris has been thoroughly reviewed by Cunningham (2002) and Bakke et al (2007). In this paper, a perfect test was assumed to be available for the diagnosis at the parasite level because both methods can achieve extremely high levels of sensitivity and specificity for gyrodactylid populations found on RBT (thus the choice about which method to use can be based on cost and processing time).…”
Section: Diagnostic Methods To Identify Gyrodactylus Salarismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification of G. salaris has been thoroughly reviewed by Cunningham (2002) and Bakke et al (2007). In this paper, a perfect test was assumed to be available for the diagnosis at the parasite level because both methods can achieve extremely high levels of sensitivity and specificity for gyrodactylid populations found on RBT (thus the choice about which method to use can be based on cost and processing time).…”
Section: Diagnostic Methods To Identify Gyrodactylus Salarismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 3 values of P*, the sample size was calculated for a range of population sizes (total number of gyrodactylids found on the fish) and Type I errors (which determine the fish level sensitivities used in stage 2). Morphological and molecular approaches have been developed to identify G. salaris (reviewed by Cunningham 2002, and thus discriminate it from other gyrodactylid species, and both are recognised by the OIE (OIE 2006). When used properly, both approaches have extremely high specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Subsample Of Total Parasite Burden Examinedmentioning
confidence: 99%