Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gypsum scaling in pressure retarded osmosis: Experiments, mechanisms and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
97
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the concentration of Ca 2+ in DSW (50% seawater) was much lower than the calcium saturation concentration which was studied in other FO scaling research [11][12][13][14]. However, there can be a counter direction flow of salts that may interact with the water flux through the membrane during the FO process since FO membrane separates the DS from FS [37][38][39].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the concentration of Ca 2+ in DSW (50% seawater) was much lower than the calcium saturation concentration which was studied in other FO scaling research [11][12][13][14]. However, there can be a counter direction flow of salts that may interact with the water flux through the membrane during the FO process since FO membrane separates the DS from FS [37][38][39].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Given that researchers have identified the potential of FO or FO hybrid systems for desalination [9,10], scaling in the FO process is gaining more attention recently. So far, the amount of research about scaling in the FO process is still limited and most researchers have been focusing on gypsum scaling [11][12][13][14]. The similar feed conditions as the RO process were simulated in the FO process, with a near-supersaturated gypsum concentration in the FS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fouling of FO membranes is more reversible than RO membranes, removal of contaminants may become more difficult when the feed stream in the FO membrane contacts the support layer [12,13]. She et al [14] investigated the membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes and concluded that fouling in pressure-driven membranes can occur at different locations of the membrane [15,16]. As shown in Figure 3(a), the foulants in the FS are transported to the active layer surface of the membrane in the AL-FS mode, resulting in a cake layer similar to fouling of the RO membranes.…”
Section: Fouling In Fo Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to She et al [15], compared to internal fouling, it is easier to remove the external fouling from the membrane surface by optimizing the hydrodynamic conditions of the feed stream (such as by increasing the cross-flow rate, applying pulsed flow [17] and employing air scouring [18]). For this reason, most researchers suggest AL-FS orientation in the FO process to prevent undesired internal fouling, even though the ICP in AL-FS is more severe than in AL-DS mode [13,19].…”
Section: Fouling In Fo Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with regards to natural organic fouling (NOM), Thelin et al [73] investigated the quality of the feed solution and membrane types, while Yip et al [74] examined the influence of the effect of fouling and cleaning by osmotic backwash using their fabricated TFC membranes. In 2014, the scaling caused by calcium sulfate dehydrate (gypsum) was studied by considering the hydraulic pressure, membrane orientation, and types of draw solution and its concentrations [75]. More recently, the influences of the hydraulic pressure and pH on PRO organic fouling were studied by Kim et al [76].…”
Section: Membrane Fouling In Promentioning
confidence: 99%