2011
DOI: 10.54991/jop.2011.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gymnospermous woods from the Late Cenozoic sediments of Rajasthan, western India

Abstract: The paper describes two gymnospermous woods, namely Araucarioxylon Kraus, 1870 and Podocarpoxylon Gothan, 1905 from the Late Cenozoic sediments (Shumar Formation) of district Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, western India. The woods indicate favourable climatic conditions for the growth of mesic vegetation in Rajasthan till Plio-Pleistocene time compared to the xeric vegetation and drier conditions in the area today.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, two are being described herein. The described fossils belong to the Shumar Formation of Plio-Pleistocene age (Bhandari, 1999;Guleria & Shukla, 2011). The fossil assemblage of this formation was found similar to the wood assemblage recovered from the Kanakawati Series/Sandhan Formation (Plio-Pleistocene) of Kachchh (Biswas, 1965(Biswas, , 1971Biswas & Raju, 1973;Lakhanpal et al, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among these, two are being described herein. The described fossils belong to the Shumar Formation of Plio-Pleistocene age (Bhandari, 1999;Guleria & Shukla, 2011). The fossil assemblage of this formation was found similar to the wood assemblage recovered from the Kanakawati Series/Sandhan Formation (Plio-Pleistocene) of Kachchh (Biswas, 1965(Biswas, , 1971Biswas & Raju, 1973;Lakhanpal et al, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…1). However, in view of its close lithological and plant fossil similarities with the Sandhan Formation of Kachchh, its age is considered as Plio-Pleistocene till more evidences are obtained (Guleria & Shukla, 2011). Although the two genera being described herein are already known from various Palaeogene and Neogene sediments of India (Prakash, 1966;Prasad, 1989;Guleria, 1990Guleria, , 1991Srivastava & Bande, 1992;Prakash et al, 1994;Tiwari & Mehrotra, 2000), this is their first record from this formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations