2017
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GWAB: a web server for the network-based boosting of human genome-wide association data

Abstract: During the last decade, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have represented a major approach to dissect complex human genetic diseases. Due in part to limited statistical power, most studies identify only small numbers of candidate genes that pass the conventional significance thresholds (e.g. P ≤ 5 × 10−8). This limitation can be partly overcome by increasing the sample size, but this comes at a higher cost. Alternatively, weak association signals can be boosted by incorporating independent data. Previous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key challenge remains in prioritizing GWAS signals and improving weak signals obtained from low frequency causative variants (Lee and Lee, 2018). The availability of whole-genome assemblies and corresponding protein-coding gene annotations, alongside additional layers of information, such as expression profiles from RNA-Seq experiments, now facilitate the integration of multiple data layers to improve GWAS results (Shim et al , 2017; Lee and Lee, 2018; Schaefer et al , 2018). Our example of the CmAPRR2 gene suggests that adding functional annotation prediction to GWAS SNPs and treating predicted genes as integral functional units could potentially be used as an informative layer that can boost the signal of causative weak associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key challenge remains in prioritizing GWAS signals and improving weak signals obtained from low frequency causative variants (Lee and Lee, 2018). The availability of whole-genome assemblies and corresponding protein-coding gene annotations, alongside additional layers of information, such as expression profiles from RNA-Seq experiments, now facilitate the integration of multiple data layers to improve GWAS results (Shim et al , 2017; Lee and Lee, 2018; Schaefer et al , 2018). Our example of the CmAPRR2 gene suggests that adding functional annotation prediction to GWAS SNPs and treating predicted genes as integral functional units could potentially be used as an informative layer that can boost the signal of causative weak associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holding the view that the genes associated with a disease tend to be functionally together, GWAB prioritizes candidate disease genes by integrating the GWAS data and human functional gene network (Shim et al, 2017). Unlike other network-based approach, GWAB has an advantage that it integrates complementary information from both populationbased approach and molecular profiling approach to identify disease-associated genes.…”
Section: Genome-wide Association Boostingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can make the best of information identified from functional experiments apart from the statistical association from GWAS. Shim et al (2017) used GWAS data from Schunkert et al (2011) as input and referenced genes from three disease gene databases (OMIM, DO, and CADgeneDB) as benchmark to predict for diseaseassociated genes. We therefore included Jung Eun Shim's results into our study.…”
Section: Genome-wide Association Boostingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been motivated by the recognition that the genes associated with a disease tend to be functionally or physically coupled. Several different approaches have been developed: Chen et al [16] proposed a Markov random field (MRF) model to incorporate pathway topology into association analysis; GWAB [17] performs network propagation on a gene cofunctional network; NetWAS [18] trains a support vector machine classifier to prioritize genes with edges in a tissue-specific network as features; and REGENT [19] utilizes a hierarchical model to integrate the embedding of genes, which are related based on multiple networks, into GWAS data. However, the gene-level association scores in all these methods are directly derived from the nearby SNPs' GWAS p value, without considering the eQTL information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%