2014
DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2014.901724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guys and ‘the rest of us’: tales of gendered aptitude and experience in educational carework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is supported by the high CLASS scores the team received recognizing both teachers' contributions to the classroom atmosphere and to child learning and development. This result is consistent with the conclusion of Mallozzi and Galman (2014) from their analysis of interviews of two inservice male teachers and two preservice female teachers: that male teachers should not be "celebrated [simply] for doing what is expected for and with students" (p. 275).…”
Section: Male Teacher Competencysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This conclusion is supported by the high CLASS scores the team received recognizing both teachers' contributions to the classroom atmosphere and to child learning and development. This result is consistent with the conclusion of Mallozzi and Galman (2014) from their analysis of interviews of two inservice male teachers and two preservice female teachers: that male teachers should not be "celebrated [simply] for doing what is expected for and with students" (p. 275).…”
Section: Male Teacher Competencysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In ECEC, male educators report experiences of exclusion (Kamberi et al, 2016), isolation (Moosa & Bhana, 2017) and suspicion (Cameron, 2006). There is also evidence of men being tokenised or valorised, being set apart as 'special', symbolic of all men or father substitutes (Mallozzi & Galman, 2014;Santos & Amâncio, 2018).…”
Section: Gender and The Ecec Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ECEC, male educators report experiences of exclusion (Kamberi et al, 2016), isolation (Moosa and Bhana, 2017) and suspicion (Cameron, 2006). There is also evidence of men being tokenised or valorised – being set apart as ‘special’, symbolic of all men or father substitutes (Mallozzi and Galman, 2014; Santos and Amâncio, 2018). Equally, the majority workforce may serve as gatekeepers, preventing a ‘foreigner’ from invading their ‘territory’ (Kamberi et al, 2016; Sargent, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, even these objections hardly hold up to most of the Disney princess or other girl-oriented material whose storylines, while often oriented around the traditional Western fairy-tale arc of heterosexual love and marriage, are much more egalitarian, nonviolent, pro-social, and progressive than teachers and parents would claim under the auspices of the dominant critiques (Hains, 2014). Many popular girl-oriented preschool characters are focused on girl empowerment, while American boy-oriented preschool programming is far more violent, racist, and hegemonic (Mallozzi and Galman, 2014). Joya and Patty were excellent teachers, but, like so many of us, myself included, they were both well-socialized to a popular culture that normalizes male dominance, male violence, male over-representation, and female marginalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%