2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00615-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut Phage Database: phage mining in the cave of wonders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of procedures from data quality control, the quality-filtered reads co-assembly, to gene annotation and quantification were also same to our previous publication ( Lu et al, 2021 ), and here presented in Supplementary File 1 . The predicted genes were annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database ( Aoki and Kanehisa, 2005 ), the carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZyme) database ( Huang et al, 2018 ), Comprehensive Antibiotic Research Database (CARD) ( Alcock et al, 2020 ), the Virulence Factors of Pathogenic Bacteria (VFPB) database ( Liu et al, 2019 ), and the Gut Phage Database (GPD; http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/metagenomics/genome_sets/gut_phage_database/ ) ( Unterer et al, 2021 ). Dysbiosis index was used to calculate the degree of microbiota dysbiosis (see Additional file 1 for calculation details; Casén et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of procedures from data quality control, the quality-filtered reads co-assembly, to gene annotation and quantification were also same to our previous publication ( Lu et al, 2021 ), and here presented in Supplementary File 1 . The predicted genes were annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database ( Aoki and Kanehisa, 2005 ), the carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZyme) database ( Huang et al, 2018 ), Comprehensive Antibiotic Research Database (CARD) ( Alcock et al, 2020 ), the Virulence Factors of Pathogenic Bacteria (VFPB) database ( Liu et al, 2019 ), and the Gut Phage Database (GPD; http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/metagenomics/genome_sets/gut_phage_database/ ) ( Unterer et al, 2021 ). Dysbiosis index was used to calculate the degree of microbiota dysbiosis (see Additional file 1 for calculation details; Casén et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used library preparation methods, such as randomly amplified and linker-amplified shotgun libraries, have limitations, as these methods are restricted to target only dsDNA viruses and can result in uneven coverage of viral genomes, particularly when the viruses are very different in proportional abundances 19, 21 . The transposon-based method, while fast and requiring low-input template, is still restricted to dsDNA 22 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specialised databases are the logical solution to balancing efficiency with performance. Two of the largest specialised gut virome datasets are the "Human Gut Virome Database, GVD", which encompasses 13,203 viral populations (Gregory et al), and the "Gut Phage Database, GPD", which encompasses 142,809 phages (Unterer et al, 2021). Unfortunately, these are not included in the popular reference databases, such as GenBank or RefSeq, that are typically used for annotating metagenomes.…”
Section: Our Dependence On Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%