1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00011964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut passage times in Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda) and aspects of summer feeding in a stony stream

Abstract: Gut passage times in Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda) were calculated by counting and measuring voided faecal pellets . Following feeding on elm leaves conditioned in a stream, or summer fine detritus from the same source, calculated gut passage times were usually short, about 2 h or less at 15 ° C . Using harder oak and beech leaves, not previously conditioned in the stream, apparent gut passage times were much longer, 8-48 h, but since intermittent feeding occurred these figures are not comparable to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare acquisition among the experimental groups, amphipods (late-stage juveniles: N=16 for both males and females, and adults: N=16 for both males and females) were allowed to feed on the radiolabeled leaves for 2 h [less than average published estimates of gut passage time in amphipods (∼3.5 h, on average); Hargrave, 1970;Neumann et al, 1999;Willoughby and Earnshaw, 1982]. Once the feeding period was over, amphipods were immediately rinsed and transferred to scintillation vials.…”
Section: Leaf Radiolabelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare acquisition among the experimental groups, amphipods (late-stage juveniles: N=16 for both males and females, and adults: N=16 for both males and females) were allowed to feed on the radiolabeled leaves for 2 h [less than average published estimates of gut passage time in amphipods (∼3.5 h, on average); Hargrave, 1970;Neumann et al, 1999;Willoughby and Earnshaw, 1982]. Once the feeding period was over, amphipods were immediately rinsed and transferred to scintillation vials.…”
Section: Leaf Radiolabelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as consumers of detritus from the riparian vegetation, grazers oflotic angiosperms must overcome chemical barriers set by plants against grazers elsewhere. (Anderson and Sedell 1979;Willoughby and Earnshaw 1982) microorganisms, especially aquatic hyphomycetes, are viewed as a major link between detritus and shredding consumers. For instance, larval growth of the dipteran Tipula requires fungi and bacteria in the diet, but for reasons other than as a direct source of carbon and nitrogen (Lawson et al 1984).…”
Section: Food-consumer Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is supported by the rapid gut passage time exhibited by many detritivores (e.g. <2 h for Gammarus pulex L., Willoughby & Earnshaw, 1982; Welton et al. , 1983) and the refractory nature of plant detritus in comparison to microbial cells (Cummins & Klug, 1979; Maltby, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%