Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently the method of choice for analyzing gut microbiota composition. As gut microbiota composition is a potential future target for clinical diagnostics, it is of utmost importance to enhance and optimize the NGS analysis procedures. Here, we have analyzed the impact of DNA extraction and selected 16S rDNA primers on the gut microbiota NGS results. Bacterial DNA from frozen stool specimens was extracted with 5 commercially available DNA extraction kits. Special attention was paid to the semiautomated DNA extraction methods that could expedite the analysis procedure, thus being especially suitable for clinical settings. The microbial composition was analyzed with 2 distinct protocols: 1 targeting the V3-V4 and the other targeting the V4-V5 area of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The overall effect of DNA extraction on the gut microbiota 16S rDNA profile was relatively small, whereas the 16S rRNA gene target region had an immense impact on the results. Furthermore, semiautomated DNA extraction methods clearly appeared suitable for NGS procedures, proposing that application of these methods could importantly reduce hands-on time and human errors without compromising the validity of results.

Analysis of endometrial microbiota by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing among infertile patients: a single‐center pilot study

“…The final library was paired‐end sequenced at 2 bp × 200 bp or 2 bp × 300 bp using a MiSeq Reagent Kit v. 3 on the Illumina MiSeq platform, depending on the primer set. As the 16S rRNA gene target region had an immense impact on the analysis results, the V1‐V2, V3‐V5, and V4 variable regions that are commonly used in 16S rRNA sequencing from human samples were compared . In order to evaluate the representation of the microbial community, the ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), containing a mixture of Pseudomonas , Escherichia , Salmonella , Lactobacillus , Enterococcus , Listeria , Bacillus , and two yeast species was used.…”

Microbiome patterns reveal the transmission of pathogenic bacteria in hilsa fish (Tenualosa ilisha) marketed for human consumption in Bangladesh

“…The application of 16S rRNA‐based sequencing in humans provides considerable fundamental information regarding the pattern and functional features of native microbiota and any intruding micro‐organisms in the intestine (Rintala et al . ). Virulence factors play a critical role in the pathogenicity of bacterial isolates.…”

“…16S rRNA-based next-generation sequencing and virulence factor-based assays are now widely used for the classification of bacteria and the analysis of bacterial pathogenicity (Srinivasan et al 2015). The application of 16S rRNA-based sequencing in humans provides considerable fundamental information regarding the pattern and functional features of native microbiota and any intruding micro-organisms in the intestine (Rintala et al 2017). Virulence factors play a critical role in the pathogenicity of bacterial isolates.…”

Heterogeneity Spacers in 16S rDNA Primers Improve Analysis of Mouse Gut Microbiomes via Greater Nucleotide Diversity

“…The V3–V4 16S rDNA primers have been commonly used across the microbiome field for soil, various animal models and humans [6,7,10,11]. As compared with sequencing other hypervariable regions, the V3–V4 hypervariable region provides a broad taxonomic range of bacteria, thus capturing more microbial diversity with decreased taxonomic bias [6,7,12]. For these reasons, many 16S rDNA-based microbiome analyses are carried out using primers designed and optimized by Illumina to amplify the V3–V4 region of mixed microbial populations.…”