2023
DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2282795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut microbiome and frailty: insight from genetic correlation and mendelian randomization

Guanghui Cui,
Shaojie Li,
Hui Ye
et al.

Abstract: Observational studies have shown that the gut microbiome is associated with frailty. However, whether these associations underlie causal effects remains unknown. Thus, this study aimed to assess the genetic correlation and causal relationships between the genetically predicted gut microbiome and frailty using linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) and Mendelian Randomization (MR). Summary statistics for the gut microbiome were obtained from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of the Mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there might be heterogeneity in IVs from different analysis platforms, experiments, and populations, which can affect the results of MR analysis ( Cui et al, 2023 ). To assess potential heterogeneity, Cochran’s Q statistic was computed, with all p -values exceeding 0.05, indicating the absence of heterogeneity in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there might be heterogeneity in IVs from different analysis platforms, experiments, and populations, which can affect the results of MR analysis ( Cui et al, 2023 ). To assess potential heterogeneity, Cochran’s Q statistic was computed, with all p -values exceeding 0.05, indicating the absence of heterogeneity in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extensive, multi-ethnic GWAS involved the coordination of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing profiles and genotyping data from 18,340 participants. A total of 211 taxa, comprising 131 genera, 35 families, 20 orders, 16 classes, and 9 phyla, were encompassed in the analysis ( Kurilshikov et al, 2021 ; Cui et al, 2023 ). The dataset for AGA included 201,214 European participants sourced from the freely accessible website FinnGen biobank.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented a set of criteria to carefully select eligible genetic IVs:(1) Significance Threshold: Due to the limited number of IVs meeting the genome-wide significance threshold ( p < 5 × 10 –8 ) ( Kurilshikov et al, 2021 ; Herbert et al, 2022 ), we opted for a relatively less stringent threshold ( p < 1 × 10 –5 ) based on previous research ( Cui et al, 2023 ; Dai et al, 2023 ; Liu et al, 2023 ; Xiao et al, 2023 ). This less stringent threshold was selected to identify potential sets of variants that are likely to be enriched for association, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment and exploration of results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We initially selected the SNPs that reached the genomewide signi cant level (P < 5×10 − 8 ). Since the number of eligible SNPs (P < 5×10 − 8 ) was too small, we ultimately used a more comprehensive threshold (P < 1×10 − 5 ) to obtain appropriate SNPs [22,23].Then, we excluded the SNPs with linkage disequilibrium (window size = 500kb, r 2 < 0.01) [24]. Palindromic SNPs were deleted to avoid the distortion of strand orientation or allele coding.…”
Section: Instrumental Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%