2022
DOI: 10.1128/mra.00256-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut Microbiome 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Taxonomic Profiling of Hospitalized Moroccan COVID-19 Patients

Abstract: We explored the gut microbiome composition in four Moroccan patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during hospitalization and treatment, using 16S rRNA gene amplicon metataxonomic profiling, and compared it with that in four healthy severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-free control subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After removing duplicate studies, screening the title and abstract, and performing a full-text assessment according to the eligibility criteria, 27 studies were finally included in this systematic review (Figure 1). Of the 27 studies, 18 studies compared only COVID-19 patients and HCs, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] six compared only recovered COVID-19 patients and HCs, [25][26][27][28][29][30] and three compared both COVID-19 and recovered COVID-19 patients to HCs [31][32][33] (Table 1, Tables S3 and S4). Twenty-two studies were conducted in Asia (17 in China [including 4 in Hong Kong SAR], two in Japan, and one each in United Arab Emirates, India, and Bangladesh), while five others were 1, Table S5).…”
Section: Study Selection and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing duplicate studies, screening the title and abstract, and performing a full-text assessment according to the eligibility criteria, 27 studies were finally included in this systematic review (Figure 1). Of the 27 studies, 18 studies compared only COVID-19 patients and HCs, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] six compared only recovered COVID-19 patients and HCs, [25][26][27][28][29][30] and three compared both COVID-19 and recovered COVID-19 patients to HCs [31][32][33] (Table 1, Tables S3 and S4). Twenty-two studies were conducted in Asia (17 in China [including 4 in Hong Kong SAR], two in Japan, and one each in United Arab Emirates, India, and Bangladesh), while five others were 1, Table S5).…”
Section: Study Selection and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%