2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1444-2906.2002.00504.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gustatory receptor responses in marbled rockfish Sebastiscus marmoratus

Abstract: Gustatory response of marbled rockfish Sebastiscus marmoratus was recorded from the facial nerve supplying the anterior palate. In amino acids, the lowest threshold was for L‐proline at 10−6–10−5 M; in ATP‐related substances, the value for inosine was approximately 10−5 M and in organic acids, the value for L‐lactic acid was approximately 10−6 M. An almost complete self‐adaptation was observed for stimulants after 5 s application. While a weak solution of L‐lactic acid as adapting stimulus depressed the respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gustatory sensitivity to Bet is variable in salmonids, with a wide sensitivity range among marine species (Kohbara et al ., 2002). Of salmonids examined, Salvelinus sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gustatory sensitivity to Bet is variable in salmonids, with a wide sensitivity range among marine species (Kohbara et al ., 2002). Of salmonids examined, Salvelinus sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite a few studies conducted with feeding stimulants for fish previously, but these were short‐term trials (Kohbara et al, ; Mackie & Adron, ; Xue & Cui, ); nevertheless, the long‐term feeding trails were efficient ways to demonstrate the effect of a feeding stimulant. Studies have been demonstrated that feeding stimulants decreasingly effective under lengthy feeding, particularly when feeding at high levels (Kamstra & Heinsbroek, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the gustatory response spectra for amino acids examined electrophysiologically, fish fall into two principal groups: one responds well to many different types of amino acids having a wide response range, and another responds to a few types of amino acids within a narrow response range spectrum (Hara 1994). Among the marine fish, red sea bream Chrysophrys major (Temminck and Schlegel) (Goh & Tamura 1980), mullet Mugil cephalus L. (Goh & Tamura 1980), tigerfish Therapon oxyrhynchus (Temminck and Schlegel) (Hidaka & Ishida 1985), jack mackerel Trachurus japonicus (Temminck and Schlegel) (Ishida & Hidaka 1987), chub mackerel Scomber japonicus (Houttuyn) (Ishida & Hidaka 1987) and marbled rockfish Sebastiscus marmoratus (Cuvier) (Kohbara, Oohara, Masuda, Hidaka, Takii & Kumai 2002) belong to the former group. On the other hand, puffer Takifugu pardalis (Temminck and Schlegel) (Kiyohara, Hidaka & Tamura 1975), yellowtail Seriola quinqueradiata (Temminck and Schlegel) (Hidaka, Ohsugi & Yamamoto 1985; Hidaka, Zeng & Kohbara 1992) and amberjack S. dumerili (Risso) (Ishida & Hidaka 1987) belong to the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the pelagic migratory species, yellowtail, amberjack and the Pacific bluefin tuna, are all included in the latter group. Furthermore, Hidaka, Nyu and Kiyohara (1976); Goh and Tamura (1980); Hidaka and Ishida (1985); Ishida and Hidaka (1987) and Kohbara et al (2002) pointed out that the taste response to Gly would be an appropriate index of the feeding habits of fish. For example, some coastal species, such as puffer, red sea bream, tigerfish and marbled rockfish, are highly sensitive to Gly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation