2012
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00799.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gustatory neural responses to umami stimuli in the parabrachial nucleus of C57BL/6J mice

Abstract: Tokita K, Yamamoto T, Boughter JD Jr. Gustatory neural responses to umami stimuli in the parabrachial nucleus of C57BL/6J mice. J Neurophysiol 107: 1545-1555, 2012. First published December 14, 2011 doi:10.1152/jn.00799.2011Umami is considered to be the fifth basic taste quality and is elicited by glutamate. The mouse is an ideal rodent model for the study of this taste quality because of evidence that suggests that this species, like humans, may sense umami-tasting compounds as unique from other basic taste q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both groups also exhibited unexpectedly long meals that were produced primarily by increases in the number of bursts rather than by increases in pause duration, indicating that PBN lesions did not impair Ex4-induced motivation to approach the spout. We are tempted to conclude that Ex4 effects on taste evaluation (to the extent that they exist) do not require the participation of the PBN, but it is important to note that our lesions principally targeted the LPBN with less consistent damage to the caudal medial and ventral lateral PBN subnuclei, where more gustatory-responsive neurons are present ( (Baird et al, 2001a, b;Fulwiler and Saper, 1984;Nishijo and Norgren, 1990;Sakai and Yamamoto, 1997;Tokita et al, 2012); see Figure 1b for example).…”
Section: Pbn Lesion Effects On Ex4 Hypophagiamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Both groups also exhibited unexpectedly long meals that were produced primarily by increases in the number of bursts rather than by increases in pause duration, indicating that PBN lesions did not impair Ex4-induced motivation to approach the spout. We are tempted to conclude that Ex4 effects on taste evaluation (to the extent that they exist) do not require the participation of the PBN, but it is important to note that our lesions principally targeted the LPBN with less consistent damage to the caudal medial and ventral lateral PBN subnuclei, where more gustatory-responsive neurons are present ( (Baird et al, 2001a, b;Fulwiler and Saper, 1984;Nishijo and Norgren, 1990;Sakai and Yamamoto, 1997;Tokita et al, 2012); see Figure 1b for example).…”
Section: Pbn Lesion Effects On Ex4 Hypophagiamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Of these subjects, 60 mice were used in our previous studies (Tokita et al, 2012; Tokita and Boughter 2012), and 22 mice were used for collection of additional data for the present study. The animals were maintained in a temperature- and humidity-controlled vivarium on a 12:12 h light-dark cycle (lights on at 0700 h, off at 1900 h), and were given free access to food (22/5 rodent diet, Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI, USA) and water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two previous single-unit recording studies from our lab (Tokita et al, 2012; Tokita and Boughter, 2012) we collected taste responses from 52 and 70 PbN neurons, respectively. These sample sizes are similar to the other few published studies of mouse taste brainstem (NST) physiology using in vivo methods (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This 500 μm stretch comprised an average of 7 fluorescently-stained sections in all mice, and likely captured the majority of gustatory-related regions in the mouse as defined by location of taste-responsive neurons from in vivo recording, FLI evoked by licking of 0.1 M NaCl, or density of cells projecting to the gustatory thalamus (Hashimoto et al, 2009; Tokita et al, 2010, 2012). Quantification of cells was made only on the side ipsilateral to the injection site and intraoral cannula.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%