Gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities: a review of antibiotic and debridement practices

Abstract

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis and debridement is controversial when treating low-and high-velocity gunshotinduced fractures, and established treatment guidelines are currently unavailable. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature for the prophylactic antibiotic and debridement policies for (1) low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities, joints, and pelvis and (2) high-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities. Low-velocity gunshot fractures of the extremities were subcategorized into operative and nonoperative cases, whereas low-velocity gunshot fractures of the joints and pelvis were evaluated based on the presence or absence of concomitant bowel injury. In the absence of surgical necessity for fracture care such as concomitant absence of gross wound contamination, vascular injury, large soft-tissue defect, or associated compartment syndrome, the literature suggests that superficial debridement for low-velocity ballistic fractures with administration of antibiotics is a satisfactory alternative to extensive operative irrigation and debridement. In operative cases or those involving bowel injuries secondary to pelvic fractures, the literature provides support for and against extensive debridement but does suggest the use of intravenous antibiotics. For high-velocity ballistic injuries, the literature points towards the practice of extensive immediate debridement with prophylactic intravenous antibiotics. Our systematic review demonstrates weak evidence for superficial debridement of low-velocity ballistic fractures, extensive debridement for high-velocity ballistic injuries, and antibiotic use for both types of injury. Intra-articular fractures seem to warrant debridement, while pelvic fractures with bowel injury have conflicting evidence for debridement but stronger evidence for antibiotic use. Given a relatively low number of studies on this subject, we recommend that further highquality research on the debridement and antibiotic use for gunshot-induced fractures of the extremities should be conducted before definitive recommendations and guidelines are developed.

Low cost 3D printed clamps for external fixator for developing countries: a biomechanical study

“…External fixation is the primary choice of temporary fracture stabilization for specific polytrauma patients [1]. Often, these traumatic injuries occur during motor accidents or are due to gun violence [2,3]. The benefits of external fixation compared to other various bone fracture treatments is that it is less invasive, more versatile and does not induce as much swelling [4].…”

The gunshot-related injuries in trauma (GRIT) study: A profile of patients affected by gunshot-related orthopaedic injuries across South Africa

“…[7] The treatment paradigm in the USA and in other high-income countries is for almost all patients to undergo surgical treatment. [13,14] These treatment algorithms are not necessarily relevant to low-velocity…”

A rare case of retained sabot after close-range shotgun injury

“…Similar to other projectiles, the pellets themselves are not a significant risk factor for wound infection, so it is our practice not to routinely remove them unless there is another specific indication for removal such as a foreign body in a joint space, causing nerve impingement, or in the lumen of a vessel or spinal canal [7,8]. We do not routinely give more than a single dose of antibiotics, usually a first-generation cephalosporin, except in the case of a fracture [9]. Shotgun injuries and their associated sequelae often require more operations and resource utilization compared to other firearm injuries [10].…”