1996
DOI: 10.2307/2960443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
146
4
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
146
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are decidedly mixed. For example, Matsusaka (2005) concludes that the initiative process leads to policies more in line with the public's desires whereas Monogan et al (2009) conclude that it does not, consistent with the original findings of Lascher et al (1996). Do ballot initiatives harm minority interests?…”
Section: Where Does This Research Fit With the Literature On Ballot Isupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results are decidedly mixed. For example, Matsusaka (2005) concludes that the initiative process leads to policies more in line with the public's desires whereas Monogan et al (2009) conclude that it does not, consistent with the original findings of Lascher et al (1996). Do ballot initiatives harm minority interests?…”
Section: Where Does This Research Fit With the Literature On Ballot Isupporting
confidence: 57%
“…They advocated using a continuous variable for frequency of initiative use. Others (e.g., Lascher et al 1996) have used a dichotomous measure to capture the threat of initiatives. Rather than attempting to settle this question a priori, we ran three models, one with a dichotomous measure, one with a continuous variable, and one with both.…”
Section: Where Does This Research Fit With the Literature On Ballot Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some disagree, given the costs of the initiative process; the role that interest groups play in writing, qualifying, and financing ballot measures; and the limited understanding that voters have of policy questions on which they are asked to vote (Lascher, Hagen, and Rochlin 1996). Some studies find evidence supporting the initiative effect, at least in some policy areas (Arceneaux 2002;Gerber 1996Gerber , 1999Matsusaka 2010;Phillips 2008), whereas others do not find an effect (Monogan, Gray, and Lowery 2009;Lascher, Hagen, and Rochlin 1996;Lax and Phillips 2009b).…”
Section: Explaining Variation In Responsiveness and Congruencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some studies find evidence supporting the initiative effect, at least in some policy areas (Arceneaux 2002;Gerber 1996Gerber , 1999Matsusaka 2010;Phillips 2008), whereas others do not find an effect (Monogan, Gray, and Lowery 2009;Lascher, Hagen, and Rochlin 1996;Lax and Phillips 2009b). Our policy-specific opinion measures might help resolve this thorny debate.…”
Section: Explaining Variation In Responsiveness and Congruencementioning
confidence: 99%