2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00601-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gulliver, a long terminal repeat retrotransposon from the genome of the oriental blood fluke Schistosoma japonicum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described above, like the errantiviruses such as gypsy (32) and ZAM (38), Boudicca may also have a third ORF encoding an envelope and, if so, may likewise be capable of horizontal transmission as an extracellular infectious particle. Boudicca was clearly distinct from Gulliver, an LTR retrotransposon reported previously from the Asian schistosome Schistosoma japonicum (36) (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As described above, like the errantiviruses such as gypsy (32) and ZAM (38), Boudicca may also have a third ORF encoding an envelope and, if so, may likewise be capable of horizontal transmission as an extracellular infectious particle. Boudicca was clearly distinct from Gulliver, an LTR retrotransposon reported previously from the Asian schistosome Schistosoma japonicum (36) (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Both the evolution and size of this genome may be highly influenced by mobile genetic elements. Indeed, more than half of the schistosome genome appears to be composed of or derived from repetitive sequences, to a large extent from retrotransposable elements (34)(35)(36).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In schistosomes, more than half of the genome appears to be composed of, or derived from, repetitive sequences, to a large extent from retrotransposable elements (Brindley 2005, Copeland et al 2005b. Schistosome MGEs include SINE-like retroposons (Spotila et al 1989, Drew & Brindley 1995, long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons (Laha et al 2001, Foulk et al 2002, Copeland et al 2003, 2005a, DeMarco et al 2004, non-LTR retrotransposons (Laha et al 2002a, b, Brindley et al 2003, and DNA transposons related to bacterial IS1016 insertion sequences (Feschotte 2004). The long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%