Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Degus (<i>Caviomorphs</i>)

McBride, Anne; Meredith, Anna

doi:10.1002/9781119333708.ch8

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both herbivorous rodents and rabbits need daily ad libitum access to hay to assure dental abrasion, bowel movement, and formation of cecotropes [ 63 ]. The hay should be offered in a hay rack [ 64 ] because placement on the floor can lead to contamination of the hay with feces [ 65 ]. The hay racks must be designed in a way that they do not pose an obvious injury risk.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The TVT also describes harnesses and leashes as absolutely inappropriate for most rodents because of the possible injury risk, among other factors; mentioned exceptions include, for example, tame rabbits that are slowly habituated to wearing a harness [ 30 ]. Most small pets (except ferrets) are prey animals that can show a startle response to certain situations and react with flight or escape attempts [ 50 , 51 , 64 , 65 ]. If, in these cases, the animals are leashed, they may incur injuries due to reflex-like flight attempts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of small mammal pet supplies offered in German retail under animal welfare aspects

Bläske¹,

Schwarzer²,

Ebner³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

German retailers offer a large variety of accessories for pets. However, not all products are suitable for pet husbandry. Several articles can negatively influence the wellbeing of pets or cause injuries, but empirical studies that evaluate accessories for small pets under animal welfare aspects are rare. In the present study, we assessed articles manufactured or sold in Germany in the product categories pet cages, hay racks, running wheels, exercise balls, harnesses and leashes, tube systems, and hamster bedding. To do so, we searched 28 German websites, visited 50 pet shops and 13 home improvement and garden centers on site and afterwards examined the animal welfare compliance of the products according to various evaluation criteria. Most of the examined products were rated not suitable for pet husbandry and were animal-welfare-adverse. This result applies to 86.1% (n = 87) of the 101 assessed running wheel models, 82.7% (n = 172) of the 208 assessed pet cage models and 55.6% (n = 40) of the 72 assessed hay rack models. The articles in the product categories exercise balls, harnesses and leashes, tube systems, and hamster bedding were also found unsuitable due to animal welfare concerns. Furthermore, we found clear shortcomings regarding article declarations. In some cases, relevant product information (e.g., dimensions) were missing, or the presented information was too general (e.g., rodent cage). Improperly declared pet accessories make it difficult for pet owners to decide whether a product is suitable or unsuitable for the species they keep. A declaration duty for manufacturers of pet products could ensure that German retailers only offer properly declared pet accessories and facilitate the decision for pet owners to purchase products appropriate for the pets they keep. Furthermore, a voluntary product certification for manufacturers would allow retailers to check the animal welfare compliance of articles before including them in their assortment. If a product is unsuitable for pet husbandry because it does not meet the set requirements, it must be considered animal-welfare-adverse and removed from the assortment. As done for the Austrian “animal welfare label,” an independent, qualified third party could do the certification.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%