2021
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsab161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guiding principles for determining work shift duration and addressing the effects of work shift duration on performance, safety, and health: guidance from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the Sleep Research Society

Abstract: Risks associated with fatigue that accumulates during work shifts have historically been managed through working time arrangements that specify fixed maximum durations of work shifts and minimum durations of time off. By themselves, such arrangements are not sufficient to curb risks to performance, safety, and health caused by misalignment between work schedules and the biological regulation of waking alertness and sleep. Science-based approaches for determining shift duration and mitigating associated risks, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 219 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurobehavioral functioning is strongly influenced by the two processes of sleep/wake regulation: a homeostatic process (“Process S”), which degrades neurobehavioral functioning over time awake and restores it during sleep; and a circadian process (“Process C”), which cycles between promoting and depressing neurobehavioral functioning across time of day [ 1 , 2 ]. The combined effect of these two processes governs changes in waking neurobehavioral functioning over time, such that day shift-workers tend to exhibit stable, near-optimal performance through the workday [ 3 , 4 ], whereas night shift-workers typically experience a steady decline of performance through the night [ 5 , 6 ]. Inter-individual differences in the contributions of the two processes notwithstanding [ 7 , 8 ], these dynamics are well understood [ 9 , 10 ] and have led to the development of biomathematical models predicting neurobehavioral performance across a wide range of sleep/wake/work scenarios [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurobehavioral functioning is strongly influenced by the two processes of sleep/wake regulation: a homeostatic process (“Process S”), which degrades neurobehavioral functioning over time awake and restores it during sleep; and a circadian process (“Process C”), which cycles between promoting and depressing neurobehavioral functioning across time of day [ 1 , 2 ]. The combined effect of these two processes governs changes in waking neurobehavioral functioning over time, such that day shift-workers tend to exhibit stable, near-optimal performance through the workday [ 3 , 4 ], whereas night shift-workers typically experience a steady decline of performance through the night [ 5 , 6 ]. Inter-individual differences in the contributions of the two processes notwithstanding [ 7 , 8 ], these dynamics are well understood [ 9 , 10 ] and have led to the development of biomathematical models predicting neurobehavioral performance across a wide range of sleep/wake/work scenarios [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for health and manufacturing industries may be due to irregular work schedules such as shift work. Unfortunately, we did not ask about shift work, however, it is well known from the literature that shift work is a risk factor for disturbing a normal sleeping pattern ( 25 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, modifying sleep schedules may be more difficult in the context of shiftwork, requiring a consistent later sleep schedule or leaving the non-day shift; in some countries, pregnant people are prohibited from working night shifts (8), which may be viewed as controversial and infringing on personal freedoms. Therefore, developing guidelines around shiftwork during pregnancy are complicated, and a number of factors, such as those recently outlined here (55), must be taken into account in addressing related health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%