We read with sadness and optimism the Editorial by McVicar et al. ''No community left behind: advancing rural anesthesia, surgery, and obstetric care in Canada'' in this edition of the Journal. 1 In their commentary, the authors discuss a recently published consensus statement (co-authored by two of them, Drs Orser and Wilson) on networks for high-quality rural anesthesia, surgery, and obstetric care in Canada that presents a model for partnerships between family physician generalists and anesthesia, surgical, and obstetrical specialists. 2 The authors advocate for a generalist-specialist network approach to remote and rural anesthesia care in Canada. We wish to thank the Journal's Editor-in-Chief for the invitation to respond to and clarify several assertions made by the authors.We would first like to clarify the statement, ''To date, the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS) has not endorsed the report'' and give reasons why the CAS did not endorse. The CAS received a near final version (draft 5) of the joint consensus statement in January 2021 and a request to officially endorse. It was clearly detailed in the draft manuscript ''A volunteer Writers' Group, drawn from