2020
DOI: 10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.kba.1.1.en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for using A global standard for the identification of Key Biodiversity Areas: version 1.1

Abstract: Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity. The purpose of the Guidelines for using A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas is to ensure that KBA identification is based on consistent, scientifically rigorous yet practical methods. These KBA Guidelines provide an overview of the steps for identifying and delineating KBAs, together with explanation of how the KBA criteria, thresholds and delineation procedures should… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other prioritisation schemes, such as Important Bird Areas, do not incorporate habitat-specific criteria, while Key Biodiversity Areas do have the criteria to include ecosystems but rely on global Red List of Ecosystem assessments (of global ecosystems or, at a broader scale, biogeographic ecotypes) that are yet to be completed (KBA, 2023; KBA Standards and Appeals Committee, 2020). IPAs, in contrast, have the flexibility to identify threatened and restricted habitats on a regional and national scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other prioritisation schemes, such as Important Bird Areas, do not incorporate habitat-specific criteria, while Key Biodiversity Areas do have the criteria to include ecosystems but rely on global Red List of Ecosystem assessments (of global ecosystems or, at a broader scale, biogeographic ecotypes) that are yet to be completed (KBA, 2023; KBA Standards and Appeals Committee, 2020). IPAs, in contrast, have the flexibility to identify threatened and restricted habitats on a regional and national scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%