1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02081.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts

Abstract: Developments in technologic and analytical procedures applied to the study of brain electrical activity have intensified interest in this modality as a means of examining brain function. The impact of these new developments on traditional methods of acquiring and analyzing electroencephalographic activity requires evaluation. Ultimately, the integration of the old with the new must result in an accepted standardized methodology to be used in these investigations. In this paper, basic procedures and recent deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
413
0
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 601 publications
(434 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
413
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Dependent EEG factors are electrode position, filtering techniques, degree and type of artifact exclusion, EEG parameter, and EEG epoch length (Oken and Chiappa 1988). Moreover, the use of various mathematical transforms may affect statistical measures of variability and correlation (Pivik et al 1993). In spite of these differences, the consensus of studies that focus on the human EEG appears to be large.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependent EEG factors are electrode position, filtering techniques, degree and type of artifact exclusion, EEG parameter, and EEG epoch length (Oken and Chiappa 1988). Moreover, the use of various mathematical transforms may affect statistical measures of variability and correlation (Pivik et al 1993). In spite of these differences, the consensus of studies that focus on the human EEG appears to be large.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handedness was determined at Time 1 according to the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971). EEG was acquired based on standard guidelines (Pivik et al, 1993). An electrode cap (ElectroCap, Eaton, Ohio) was positioned according to the International 10-20 System (American Electroencephalographic Society, 1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetry index was considered to represent interhemispheric differences between the AH and UH with their respective rMTs. Asymmetry index was computed in a similar manner as done with imaging data [5] or electroencephalography [22]. Positive asymmetry index indicates higher rMT on the AH than on the UH.…”
Section: Motor Threshold Asymmetry Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%