2005
DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the current study included a robust statistical analysis to adjust for baseline risk stratification. Although the clinical management of individual patients was performed according to the judgment of individual board certified surgeons, patient selection adhered to published guidelines for lumbar fusion (22)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the current study included a robust statistical analysis to adjust for baseline risk stratification. Although the clinical management of individual patients was performed according to the judgment of individual board certified surgeons, patient selection adhered to published guidelines for lumbar fusion (22)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall mean AE SD age was 56 25. AE 10.91 years (MIS-TLIF: 56.62 AE 11.69 years vs. open-TLIF: 56.12 AE 10.68 years, P ¼ 0.82), of which 67 were men and 81 were women, Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…14 Proponents of EMG claim that it provides useful clinical information regarding the status of the pedicle wall. 12,18,19 However, opponents cite evidence of false-negative rates (i.e. post-operative neurologic injury despite normal EMG readings), suggesting that intraoperative EMG does not help surgeons avoid neurologic injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the American Academy of Neurosurgeons and the American Society of Neuromonitoring list EMG as the most useful root monitoring technique. 9,10 However, recent studies questioned the reliability of free-run EMG in preventing nerve root palsy, noting the high incidence of false-positives and very low positive-predictive value. [11][12][13] Direct electrical stimulation of nerve roots to evoke an EMG response has promise, 10,14 but may be difficult to perform during active retraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%