2008
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-093906
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute–Working Group 1996 guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

19
2,707
4
84

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,910 publications
(2,864 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
19
2,707
4
84
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR), CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), partial response (PR), or PR with lymphocytosis (PR‐L), per the International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) 2008 criteria modified for treatment‐related lymphocytosis (Hallek et al , 2008, 2012). Efficacy endpoints were based on investigator assessments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR), CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR), partial response (PR), or PR with lymphocytosis (PR‐L), per the International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) 2008 criteria modified for treatment‐related lymphocytosis (Hallek et al , 2008, 2012). Efficacy endpoints were based on investigator assessments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustained haematological improvement was defined as an increase in cytopenias that was sustained continuously for ≥56 days without transfusion or growth factors, as measured by the following: an increase in the platelet count or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) from baseline of ≥50% or, for haemoglobin, an increase from baseline of ≥20 g/l. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (https://www.eortc.be/services/doc/ctc/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf), with the exception of haematological toxicities, which were graded per iwCLL 2008 criteria (Hallek et al , 2008). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All CLL cases were diagnosed according to the iwCLL guidelines and displayed a typical CLL phenotype 31 . Over 76% of samples were collected before treatment and within a median of 7 months from time of diagnosis (EGR2-mutated cases, median 2 months).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Fifty-nine samples were obtained from patients diagnosed with CLL at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital and Southampton General Hospital following ethical committee approvals (06/Q2202/30 and 228/02/t, respectively) under the declaration of Helsinki (Supplementary Table 1). Malignant cell isolation and the determination of their purity have been described previously.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive disease is characterised by unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) genes, ZAP70 and CD38 expression. 1 Genetic markers including deletions of 17p, 11q and 13q, trisomy 12 and TP53 mutations [2][3][4] have been known to impact prognosis for some time, however with the emergence of next generation sequencing, a plethora of new genetic alterations have been identified including NOTCH1 (10-15%) [5][6][7][8] and SF3B1 (10-17%) [8][9][10] mutations which identify patients with progressive disease. 8 SF3B1 is one of the proteins that make up the spliceosome and regulates excision of introns from premRNA 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%