2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0392.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Canine Chronic Valvular Heart Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
474
4
50

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(532 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
474
4
50
Order By: Relevance
“…The assignment of proper clinical stage plays a fundamental role in planning therapeutic strategy and formulating a prognosis in patients with DMVD 4, 18. However, clinical staging may not adequately reflect intrinsic myocardial condition and structural changes, because guidelines for the classification of heart failure are based on clinical signs 18.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assignment of proper clinical stage plays a fundamental role in planning therapeutic strategy and formulating a prognosis in patients with DMVD 4, 18. However, clinical staging may not adequately reflect intrinsic myocardial condition and structural changes, because guidelines for the classification of heart failure are based on clinical signs 18.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical staging may not adequately reflect intrinsic myocardial condition and structural changes, because guidelines for the classification of heart failure are based on clinical signs 18. Because the clinical signs of DMVD develop slowly over a period of years, they are often recognized only after cardiac remodeling has already occurred 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each dog, based on clinical signs, echocardiographic examinations, and thoracic radiography, CVHD was classified as Stage B1, B2, C, or D according to the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) consensus statement 17. Stage B1 included dogs without clinical signs of CVHD and echocardiographic evidence of cardiomegaly (ie, LA/Ao < 1.6 and LVEDDN < 1.85) 14, 15, 17, 18.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, each dog was classified into 1 of 4 clinical cohorts (Fig 1, Table 1): group 1—asymptomatic, healthy dogs without HD; group 2—asymptomatic, healthy dogs with HD but not CHF; group 3—dogs with respiratory distress attributable to respiratory disease; group 4—dogs with respiratory distress from pulmonary edema and CHF. HD severity was graded using ISACHC18 and ACVIM‐HD19, 26 schemes. Briefly, these schemes were characterized as follows: The ISACHC cardiac disease grading system specified: class IA—subclinical HD disease without radiographic or echocardiographic evidence of cardiac enlargement; class IB—subclinical HD with radiographic or echocardiographic evidence of cardiac enlargement; class II—mild signs of CHF (eg, increased respiratory rate and effort, exercise intolerance) because of cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and associated with cardiomegaly; class IIIA—severe, overt signs of CHF that could be treated on an outpatient basis; class IIIB—severe signs of CHF requiring hospitalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%