2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b00582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for the Analysis of Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium Data

Abstract: It is current practice to represent and analyze vapor–liquid equilibrium data through the use of state conditions (temperature and pressure) and phase compositions. However, these representations do not reveal and identify the accuracy of the data for important purposes, such as separation by distillationand this is particularly a problem for the important low-concentration regions. The intent of this editorial is to present the guidelines of the Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data that vapor–liquid equili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation between our data and the mean of the literature data at the observed boiling temperature is less than ±0.2 K for all pressures, which is below the standard uncertainty specified above. As a further validation of the VLE data, as suggested by Mathias, 26 the relative volatility was evaluated, which is presented in the Supporting Information for 20 and 80 kPa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deviation between our data and the mean of the literature data at the observed boiling temperature is less than ±0.2 K for all pressures, which is below the standard uncertainty specified above. As a further validation of the VLE data, as suggested by Mathias, 26 the relative volatility was evaluated, which is presented in the Supporting Information for 20 and 80 kPa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures , , and show the results of regression for the Wilson model by the corresponding fitted curves obtained using the Britt–Luecke algorithm . As analysis of VLE data using relative volatilities enables improved data evaluation, Figure also indicates the ±5% deviation from the trend predicted by the Wilson model. Predictions by NRTL and UNIQUAC models are found to be close to the Wilson fit, and they are illustrated in Figures S.1–S.6 of the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figures 3, 6, and 7 show the results of regression for the Wilson model by the corresponding fitted curves obtained using the Britt−Luecke algorithm. 16 As analysis of VLE data using relative volatilities enables improved data evaluation, 17 To compare the calculated values with the experimental data, average deviation (AD), maximum deviation (MD), rootmean-square deviation (RMSD), and average absolute deviation (AAD) for the liquid phase composition (x), vapor phase composition (y) of ACP, and the temperature (T) were calculated. 18 For the binary systems (ACP + PEA), the deviation parameters for the regression using NRTL, UNIQUAC, and Wilson models are presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the residuals of temperature and vapor mole fraction, the reliability of VLE data measured for each system has been checked (Orchillés et al, 2017;Mathias, 2017;Ma et al, 2018). Since the values of RMSD by the NRTL model were relatively larger than those of the Wilson and UNIQUAC models, the residuals of temperature and vapor mole fraction were calculated based on the difference between experimental values and the calculated values in the NRTL model.…”
Section: Vle Data Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%