2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for Performing Ultrasound Guided Vascular Cannulation: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
392
0
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 423 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
7
392
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…With a linear probe, central venous access to the femoral, internal jugular, and subclavian veins can be obtained safely, reducing complications, the number of attempts, and the time required to gain access. 760,761 The impact of real-time ultrasound guidance is even greater in obese patients, in procedures with less experienced operators, and in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy.…”
Section: Section 6: Technology and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a linear probe, central venous access to the femoral, internal jugular, and subclavian veins can be obtained safely, reducing complications, the number of attempts, and the time required to gain access. 760,761 The impact of real-time ultrasound guidance is even greater in obese patients, in procedures with less experienced operators, and in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy.…”
Section: Section 6: Technology and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple published guidelines support the clinical utility of ultrasound guidance, but together they only partially address the best practice of ultrasound-guided vascular access [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Recommendations from our consensus vary significantly in their quality, methodology, clinical scope and targeted audience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coercive medical treatment for minors is generally neither an issue in international clinical guidelines nor in the law regulating the practice in Norway, where this study was performed (Stock, Hill, & Babl, 2012; Troianos et al, 2011). However, the main rule in Norwegian health law, as in international human rights guidelines, is that any use of coercion requires an explicit legal authority, a formal decision, and appeal procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%