2008
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318169eda9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for evaluation of new fever in critically ill adult patients: 2008 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Abstract: The panel concluded that, because fever can have many infectious and noninfectious etiologies, a new fever in a patient in the intensive care unit should trigger a careful clinical assessment rather than automatic orders for laboratory and radiologic tests. A cost-conscious approach to obtaining cultures and imaging studies should be undertaken if indicated after a clinical evaluation. The goal of such an approach is to determine, in a directed manner, whether infection is present so that additional testing ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
479
2
31

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 542 publications
(513 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
1
479
2
31
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, these markers cannot be recommended distinguishing between severe infection and other acute inflammatory states [69], but they can be helpful adjunctive diagnostic markers to be interpreted in context with information from careful medical history, physical examination.…”
Section: The Diagnosis Of Sepsismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, these markers cannot be recommended distinguishing between severe infection and other acute inflammatory states [69], but they can be helpful adjunctive diagnostic markers to be interpreted in context with information from careful medical history, physical examination.…”
Section: The Diagnosis Of Sepsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the main aims that should guide the choice of antiinfective treatments are [69,70]: Table 5 Proposals from the literature of empiric antibiotic antimicrobial choice based on suspected site of infection.…”
Section: 47 For Healthcare-associated Infections Non-responsive To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agreement between the two devices was better for normothermia (36.0°C to \38.3°C) (mean 0.28°C; 95% CI, 0.21°C to 0.35°C) than for hypothermia (\36°C) (mean difference 0.88°C; 95% CI, 0.75°C to 1.01°C) 5 or for hyperthermia (C38.3°C) (mean difference -0.71°C; 95% CI, -0.88°C to -0.55°C). 1 The range of readings was 35.4 to 41.8°C for the bladder thermometer and 25.1°C to 45.6°C for WiTAT. The sensitivity for detecting hyperthermia using WiTAT was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.56) and the specificity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.86).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1,2 However, measuring temperature in these locations is invasive and impractical for most patients. 1 A simple reliable accurate and non-invasive method for measuring temperature is needed in clinical practice. Finvers et al developed a novel non-invasive continuous temperature assessment method using a wireless temporal artery bandage thermometer (WiTAT).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation