2009
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for Epo use in children with cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the paucity of reported data, similar such guidelines are unavailable in the pediatric literature. In his editorial response to the French guidelines, Feusner ( 2009 ) concurs that evidence is lacking to support ESA use in pediatric oncology patients as their benefi t in quality of life and cost-effectiveness in this patient population as well as their potential risks in regard to tumor progression, overall survival and thromboembolism are unclear. From the adult oncology literature it is unclear if there is potency difference between subcutaneous and intravenous rhEPO administration although studies in adult hemodialysis patients have shown that subcutaneous injection is approximately 30 % more effective (Kaufman et al 1998 ;Galliford et al 2005 ;Vercaigne et al 2005 ).…”
Section: Erythropoietinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the paucity of reported data, similar such guidelines are unavailable in the pediatric literature. In his editorial response to the French guidelines, Feusner ( 2009 ) concurs that evidence is lacking to support ESA use in pediatric oncology patients as their benefi t in quality of life and cost-effectiveness in this patient population as well as their potential risks in regard to tumor progression, overall survival and thromboembolism are unclear. From the adult oncology literature it is unclear if there is potency difference between subcutaneous and intravenous rhEPO administration although studies in adult hemodialysis patients have shown that subcutaneous injection is approximately 30 % more effective (Kaufman et al 1998 ;Galliford et al 2005 ;Vercaigne et al 2005 ).…”
Section: Erythropoietinmentioning
confidence: 99%