2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9706-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for CSF Processing and Biobanking: Impact on the Identification and Development of Optimal CSF Protein Biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite having extensively been studied for the detection of tumor biomarkers, few of CSF markers have found a clinical application 11 . While there is consensus about the fact that CSF is amenable for the research of biomarkers of neurological disease, literature reports high variability across studies that hinders implementation in clinical practice 58 . Notwithstanding the fforts in identifying novel CSF biomarkers, the high variability observed across different studies has hampered their clinical implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite having extensively been studied for the detection of tumor biomarkers, few of CSF markers have found a clinical application 11 . While there is consensus about the fact that CSF is amenable for the research of biomarkers of neurological disease, literature reports high variability across studies that hinders implementation in clinical practice 58 . Notwithstanding the fforts in identifying novel CSF biomarkers, the high variability observed across different studies has hampered their clinical implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the fforts in identifying novel CSF biomarkers, the high variability observed across different studies has hampered their clinical implementation. Such variability is partly due to protein stability issues, highlighting the importance to standardize withdrawal procedures 58 . Optimization of protocols for CSF sample collection and treatment have been recently proposed for biomarker studies, although from lumbar puncture 59 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite widespread use in Europe, studies of these core CSF biomarkers have found significant inter‐laboratory and batch‐to‐batch variability 7,37 . There are three possible sources of variability to be considered when interpreting CSF biomarker results or when defining CSF biomarker cutoffs: (1) pre‐analytical (i.e., due to differences in the collection, handling, and storage of CSF); 38 (2) analytical (i.e., due to differences in technician skill or how the assays are used in the lab, and lot‐to‐lot variability of reference materials, kits and/or kit components); 37,39 and (3) biological/patient‐related (i.e., confounding factors linked to patients, such as patient age).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Despite widespread use in Europe, studies of these core CSF biomarkers have found significant inter-laboratory and batch-to-batch variability. 7,37 There are three possible sources of variability to be considered when interpreting CSF biomarker results or when defining CSF biomarker cutoffs: (1) pre-analytical (i.e., due to differences in the collection, handling, and storage of CSF); 38 (2) analytical (i.e., due to differences (C11RMP9 and C12RMP1, respectively). 7,41 Initiatives to obtain standardization of Aβ1-40 and t-tau are ongoing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We need to unify the operation of the assays and verify the appropriate criteria of the normal range to be aware of misuse and abuse. Through efforts from global consortiums on biomarkers, the methods and cut-off points of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in the A-T-N-X framework have been partially aligned in AD, and the quality control program has been established [ 23 ] ( https://www.alz.org/research/for_researchers/partnerships/gbsc ; https://fnih.org/what-we-do/biomarkers-consortium ; https://www.ifcc.org/ ; http://www.neurochem.info/ ). Evaluations of biomarkers in the framework are not limited to a simple dichotomy [ 24 ].…”
Section: Addition Of X To the A-t-n Biomarker Framework To Reflect Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%