2003
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.10012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for case classification for the national birth defects prevention study

Abstract: The case classification schema developed for the NBDPS may be of value to other clinicians working on epidemiologic studies of birth defects etiology. Consideration of these guidelines will lead to more comparable case groups, an important element of careful studies aimed at identifying risk factors for birth defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
583
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 532 publications
(586 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
583
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Congenital malformations were classified as major or minor by two experts according to established standards (21)(22)(23). Major birth defects were defined as structural abnormalities of medical, surgical, or cosmetic relevance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital malformations were classified as major or minor by two experts according to established standards (21)(22)(23). Major birth defects were defined as structural abnormalities of medical, surgical, or cosmetic relevance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the definitions of major and minor congenital malformations developed by the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (29)(30)(31). Chromosomal diseases were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain malformations, such as pulmonary hypoplasia, intestinal malrotation, gastric volvulus, and patent ductus arteriosus were considered part of a diaphragm defect sequence and were not tabulated as separate malformations [Fauza and Wilson, 1994]. Importance of precise case classification [Holmes et al, 1976;Rasmussen et al, 2003] has been stressed by others and accordingly, we classified infants with CDH in two ways, by phenotype and by likely etiology (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%