1998
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.29.2.554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for Carotid Endarterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Preoperative evaluation included ultrasound assessment of plaque density and presence of ulceration. Carotid endarterectomies were performed by standard eversion technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Preoperative evaluation included ultrasound assessment of plaque density and presence of ulceration. Carotid endarterectomies were performed by standard eversion technique.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 -10 Internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis has been recognized as a major cause of stroke, and carotid endarterectomy has been validated by several large trials as effective in prevention of stroke secondary to severe ICA stenosis. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Interactions within the ICA stenosing plaque between connective tissue and the cells embedded in the fibrous cap overlying the inner core filled with lipids and necrotic debris appear to determine the history of the ICA stenosis, including complications that are recognized cause of stroke, such as plaque rupture or ulceration, intraplaque hemorrhage, and luminal thrombosis. 17,18 The aim of this study was to investigate whether the MMP-3 and/or the MMP-1 promoter polymorphisms are associated with the presence of severe ICA stenosis in patients subjected to carotid endarterectomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indication for endarterectomy was based on clinical and radiological criteria as recommended by guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. 12,13 An ICA stenosis Ͼ70% was considered a surgical indication in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients; in selected symptomatic patients, a surgical approach was proposed in patients with stenosis Ͼ50%. The endovascular treatment was performed in patients with a stenosis Ͼ70% who could not be submitted to a surgical procedure because of a poor general condition.…”
Section: Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the margin of success of CE in asymptomatic ICA stenosis is much narrower than for those with symptomatic ICA stenosis and largely depends on the ability to keep surgical complications rates exceptionally low (<3%). The AHA [37]has recently published guidelines for CE, particularly in asymptomatic patients. AHA [37]recommends CE in asymptomatic ICA stenosis in the following conditions: proven indications for stenotic lesions ≥60% diameter reduction for patients with a surgical risk <3% and life expectancy of at least 5 years, whereas they recommend acceptable but not proven indications for ICA stenosis ≥75% concerning patients with a surgical risk of 3–5%.…”
Section: Surgical Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHA [37]has recently published guidelines for CE, particularly in asymptomatic patients. AHA [37]recommends CE in asymptomatic ICA stenosis in the following conditions: proven indications for stenotic lesions ≥60% diameter reduction for patients with a surgical risk <3% and life expectancy of at least 5 years, whereas they recommend acceptable but not proven indications for ICA stenosis ≥75% concerning patients with a surgical risk of 3–5%. The intervention is justified if the patient has a probability of survival more than 5 years and if we dispose of a good surgical center (mortality-stroke morbidity <3%), and the stenosis is ≥60% [37].…”
Section: Surgical Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%