Guidelines for a graph‐theoretic implementation of structural equation modeling

Abstract

Abstract. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is increasingly being chosen by researchers as a framework for gaining scientific insights from the quantitative analyses of data. New ideas and methods emerging from the study of causality, influences from the field of graphical modeling, and advances in statistics are expanding the rigor, capability, and even purpose of SEM. Guidelines for implementing the expanded capabilities of SEM are currently lacking. In this paper we describe new developments in SEM that we believe constitute a third-generation of the methodology. Most characteristic of this new approach is the generalization of the structural equation model as a causal graph. In this generalization, analyses are based on graph theoretic principles rather than analyses of matrices. Also, new devices such as metamodels and causal diagrams, as well as an increased emphasis on queries and probabilistic reasoning, are now included. Estimation under a graph theory framework permits the use of Bayesian or likelihood methods. The guidelines presented start from a declaration of the goals of the analysis. We then discuss how theory frames the modeling process, requirements for causal interpretation, model specification choices, selection of estimation method, model evaluation options, and use of queries, both to summarize retrospective results and for prospective analyses.The illustrative example presented involves monitoring data from wetlands on Mount Desert Island, home of Acadia National Park. Our presentation walks through the decision process involved in developing and evaluating models, as well as drawing inferences from the resulting prediction equations. In addition to evaluating hypotheses about the connections between human activities and biotic responses, we illustrate how the structural equation (SE) model can be queried to understand how interventions might take advantage of an environmental threshold to limit Typha invasions.The guidelines presented provide for an updated definition of the SEM process that subsumes the historical matrix approach under a graph-theory implementation. The implementation is also designed to permit complex specifications and to be compatible with various estimation methods. Finally, they are meant to foster the use of probabilistic reasoning in both retrospective and prospective considerations of the quantitative implications of the results.

How does pedogenesis drive plant diversity?

“…Furthermore, there has been an infusion of new ideas into quantitative modeling, such as the discovery that it is necessary to formalize causal reasoning for artificial intelligence systems [55]. These ideas are now being incorporated into SEM, providing a stronger foundation for developing and testing multivariate models [67].…”

Shading and litter mediate the effects of soil fertility on the performance of an understorey herb

“…'mediating' effects (defined in Grace et al, 2012), were examined with mediation tests (d-separation tests, Shipley, 2009;Clough, 2012). We first considered which abiotic variable (serpentine soils or elevation) was significantly related to each biotic condition (overstorey shading, litter, understorey cover, mycorrhizal or septate fungal colonization) and whether these biotic conditions were significantly associated with plant variables (presence, abundance or reproduction).…”

Environmental Predictors of Seabird Wrecks in a Tropical Coastal Area

“…This method is suitable to examine causal relationships of direct and indirect effects of predictor on response variables [76]. In addition, SEM allows for the estimation of composite variables not directly measured in the study (also called latent variables), by including two or more observed variables [77]. For each species, we fitted models with significant predictor variables and with importance values greater than 0.70 according to the GLMMs and variables directed linked to the hypothesis of this study, namely, sea surface temperature, chlorophyll-a concentrations, wave height and river outflow.…”