1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines and care pathways for genetic diseases: the Scottish collaborative project on tuberous sclerosis

Abstract: In Scotland a national audit project has been undertaken to devise evidencebased guidelines for the clinical management of patients with tuberous sclerosis (TS), a dominantly inherited multisystem disorder. In order to facilitate the audit and use of these guidelines a 'Care Pathway' was devised to form the patient records. We describe the process of guideline development for TS and our TS Care Pathway.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ICPs represent a single common record of care1 6 allowing each discipline involved to record their own involvement and provide and be kept up to date with the outcome of appointments with other specialists. In some circumstances, multidisciplinary consensus meetings leading to the production of the ICP might result in an agreement to hold multidisciplinary clinics to coordinate care, where this seems appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICPs represent a single common record of care1 6 allowing each discipline involved to record their own involvement and provide and be kept up to date with the outcome of appointments with other specialists. In some circumstances, multidisciplinary consensus meetings leading to the production of the ICP might result in an agreement to hold multidisciplinary clinics to coordinate care, where this seems appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent recommendations favour CT or MRI, at least in adults [ 7 , 13 ]. The more frequent use of ultrasound in our study may reflect older recommendations [ 18 , 25 , 26 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%