2018
DOI: 10.1111/epi.14579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guideline‐based and bioinformatic reassessment of lesion‐associated gene and variant pathogenicity in focal human epilepsies

Abstract: Summary Objective Increasing availability of surgically resected brain tissue from patients with focal epilepsy and focal cortical dysplasia or low‐grade glioneuronal tumors has fostered large‐scale genetic examination. However, assessment of pathogenicity of germ line and somatic variants remains difficult. Here, we present a state‐of‐the‐art evaluation of reported genes and variants associated with epileptic brain lesions. Methods We critically reevaluated the pathogenicity for all neuropathology‐associated … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found an upward trend for the number of genes with pathogenic variants being reported (Figure in the Supplement). However, not all genetic variants identified in a diagnostic test are pathogenic 10,22 . Interpretation guidelines have been developed by the community, leading to the implementation of the ACMG guidelines in 2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found an upward trend for the number of genes with pathogenic variants being reported (Figure in the Supplement). However, not all genetic variants identified in a diagnostic test are pathogenic 10,22 . Interpretation guidelines have been developed by the community, leading to the implementation of the ACMG guidelines in 2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all genetic variants identified in a diagnostic test are pathogenic. 10,18 Interpretation guidelines have been developed by the community, leading to the implementation of the (ACMG) guidelines in 2015. We examined whether investigators applied the guidelines in NDD sequencing studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Largescale studies of this type can be undertaken by any group without need to access patient-related information. 13,14 In comparison, patient-based variant reclassification takes into account patient and family related data, such as segregation and phenotypic data, in addition to the updated variant frequency and literature information. This reclassification has to be done by the same group that published the original cohort, thus making this type of study more difficult to perform and less frequent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%