1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1992.tb00088.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided wave propagation across sharp lateral heterogeneities: the complete wavefield at plane vertical discontinuities

Abstract: S U M M A R Y 3-D wave propagation in a waveguide composed of laterally homogeneous partitions separated by vertical interfaces is treated in an exact manner. In each laterally homogeneous subregion, the wavefield is represented by Love-and Rayleigh-type modes, combined in such a way that displacements and tractions are continuous at the vertical discontinuities. In order t o achieve exact continuity at the interfaces, near-field modes which exponentially decay in the propagation direction and are associated t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, evanescent waves with imaginary phase velocity, of which there are generally in®nitely many if there are any at all, cannot be admitted in a spherical geometry. This notion is at odds with the fact that other geometries that are bounded in one dimension admit evanescent wave solutions travelling in an orthogonal direction, for example, elastic wave propagation parallel to the axis of a cylinder (Love 1944, article 200;Gray & MacRobert 1952, Section XVI.3) or parallel to a plane-layered medium bounded by two planes (Malischewsky 1987;Nolet et al 1989;Stange & Friederich 1992). The mathematical form of the minor arc (®rst-arriving) term approaches the plane-layered case as the radius of curvature of the sphere approaches in®nity, and the question arises as to why evanescent waves should be present in the latter but not in the former.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, evanescent waves with imaginary phase velocity, of which there are generally in®nitely many if there are any at all, cannot be admitted in a spherical geometry. This notion is at odds with the fact that other geometries that are bounded in one dimension admit evanescent wave solutions travelling in an orthogonal direction, for example, elastic wave propagation parallel to the axis of a cylinder (Love 1944, article 200;Gray & MacRobert 1952, Section XVI.3) or parallel to a plane-layered medium bounded by two planes (Malischewsky 1987;Nolet et al 1989;Stange & Friederich 1992). The mathematical form of the minor arc (®rst-arriving) term approaches the plane-layered case as the radius of curvature of the sphere approaches in®nity, and the question arises as to why evanescent waves should be present in the latter but not in the former.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alsop 1966;McGarr & Alsop 1967;Malischewsky 1976Malischewsky , 1987Meier et al 1997a). Stange & Friederich (1992a) described a mode-matching technique in a closed waveguide for a sequence of vertical discontinuities and included modes with complex wavenumbers in order to obtain a complete mode set. Stange & Friederich (1992a) described a mode-matching technique in a closed waveguide for a sequence of vertical discontinuities and included modes with complex wavenumbers in order to obtain a complete mode set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most textbooks the theory of surface waves is developed for a layered halfspace. However, when dealing with the propagation of surface waves across a plane vertical discontinuity (Stange & Friederich 1992, henceforth referred to as SF1) we had to accept the fact that on a layered halfspace it is impossible to obtain an exact solution of this problem by mode-matching techniques. The simple reason is that the surface wave modes for a layered halfspace with bounded shear wave velocity at large depth do not form a complete set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%