2014
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided wave interaction with hole damage using the local interaction simulation approach

Abstract: This paper considers the effects of hole damage on guided wave propagation in isotropic and composite plates using both the local interaction simulation approach (LISA) and experimental methods. Guided wave generation from piezoceramic wafers is modeled using the recently developed LISA hybrid approach. First, holes in isotropic plates are simulated to establish LISAʼs ability to capture the guided wave scattering effects of various hole sizes. Experimental results are compared with the simulations to aid in e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A conventional finite element model containing the detailed information of each lamina may become computationally intensive and it is difficult to accommodate the accuracy requirements for highfrequency and short wavelength guided waves over long propagation distances. 14 Several highly efficient techniques have been developed for modeling guided wave propagation in composite plates such as the global matrix method (GMM), 15,16 local interaction simulation approach (LISA), 10,17 elastodynamic finite integration technique (EFIT), 18 spectral finite element method (SFEM), 19,20 and semi-analytical finite element (SAFE) method. 21 Glushkov et al 22 proposed a Green's matrix-based method to investigate the guided wave excitation and diffraction by surface obstacles in composite plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A conventional finite element model containing the detailed information of each lamina may become computationally intensive and it is difficult to accommodate the accuracy requirements for highfrequency and short wavelength guided waves over long propagation distances. 14 Several highly efficient techniques have been developed for modeling guided wave propagation in composite plates such as the global matrix method (GMM), 15,16 local interaction simulation approach (LISA), 10,17 elastodynamic finite integration technique (EFIT), 18 spectral finite element method (SFEM), 19,20 and semi-analytical finite element (SAFE) method. 21 Glushkov et al 22 proposed a Green's matrix-based method to investigate the guided wave excitation and diffraction by surface obstacles in composite plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a way LISA -although being based on the FD discretization -outperforms the conventional FD algorithms. The advantage of using SIM for modelling wave propagation has been demonstrated in composite laminates [8] and metallic structures [9]. Enhancement in computational accuracy, efficiency and reliability for wave propagation modelling based on LISA with SIM, when compared with the use of then traditional FD methods, has been already confirmed [5].…”
Section: Local Interaction Simulation Approach (Lisa)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Combined with the models of elastic wave scattering on joints of plates [49,50], e.g., the thermal weld in the PE layer, the use of these methods could provide a reliable basis for the simulation of guided wave propagation in undamaged structures. One of the fundamental mechanisms of elastic wave interaction with damage is forward and backward scattering, both in the case of introduced cuts and simulated erosion of the PE layer [51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. The amplitude of transmitted and backscattered waves depends on various factors, including excitation frequency (which determines the relative length of the excited Lamb waves and the extent of damage) and damage depth [53].…”
Section: Application Of Pzt Sensors For Damage Detection Of Pe Layermentioning
confidence: 99%