2023
DOI: 10.18174/585990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guide for designing a national seed road map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment tools are elaborated in the Guide for designing a National Seed Road Map (NSRM) (De Boef & Thijssen, 2023). They were combined and adapted based on the purpose and context of the assessment.…”
Section: Seed Sector Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment tools are elaborated in the Guide for designing a National Seed Road Map (NSRM) (De Boef & Thijssen, 2023). They were combined and adapted based on the purpose and context of the assessment.…”
Section: Seed Sector Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of their obvious economic value, it is well established that LR are increasingly, globally threatened (Vavilov, 1957;Bennett, 1971;Harlan, 1972;1975;Frankel, 1970;Frankel, 1972;Frankel, 1973;Hawkes, 1983) and it has been argued that they are the most severely threatened element of all biodiversity (Maxted, 2006). The justification for this proposition being: (i) there are very few inventories of extant LR in each country, each region, or globally (Maxted and Scholten, 2007;FAO, 2011: Jarvis et al, 2011de Boef et al, 2013;Almeida et al, 2023); (ii) some government agencies and seed companies are actively promoting the replacement of genetically diverse LR by modern genetically uniform cultivars (Frankel and Hawkes, 1975;Harlan, 1975;Negri, 2005); (iii) in most countries no agency is direct responsibility for their conservation (Raggi et al, 2022); (iv) LR sales have been and are impacted by seed legislation that requires all crop seed to be registered before it can be sold and to comply involves an additional cost to individual growers so inadvertently restricts seed sale and LR production (Maxted et al, 2013); (v) the internationalisation of food systems and pressure of evolving markets predicates varietal standards and uniformity (Negri, 2003;Joshi et al, 2004;Maxted et al, 2013); (vi) LR maintainers are often subsistence farmer growing LR for family or local consumption, but their prime motivation is commercial gain or food production not LR conservation for its own sake (Veteläinen et al, 2009); (vii) LR maintainers are almost always elderly and their number is dwindling each year (average age in the UK was 65 (Scholten et al, 2008); (viii) there is ineffective transmission of LR knowledge (cultivation and marketing) from maintainer generation to generation (Negri, 2003;Camacho-Villa et al, 2005); (ix) the traditional LR maintenance from generation to generation is breaking down with the children of maintainers failing to take over LR maintenance or farming altogether…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also involved helping to make a sector vision of what the transformed sector would be in the future, and strategizing on how this vision could be achieved. In its sector programmes, WCDI often provided input to design strategies which stimulated sector transformation towards higher levels of performance and sustainability (such as the development of national seed road maps, for which see DeBoef and Thijssen, 2023). WCDI in its programmes started helping sector champions to collaboratively address problems and opportunities and continue the transformation process towards a next level of sector performance.Additionally, WCDI started to help sector actors to monitor progress in improving sector performance targeted at selected priorities, by undertaking baselines and subsequent repeated measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%