2017
DOI: 10.1002/pds.4305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance to reinforce the credibility of health care database studies and ensure their appropriate impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, before pooling data through meta-analysis (MA), validity remains a crucial aspect of study design and conception. [25][26][27][28] In particular, validation of the diagnoses is critical in the diabetes area, especially when in multinational epidemiological studies, 29 because the lack of clinical data may compromise optimal algorithms for patients' and outcomes' iden-…”
Section: Administrative Claims Databases: Validity Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, before pooling data through meta-analysis (MA), validity remains a crucial aspect of study design and conception. [25][26][27][28] In particular, validation of the diagnoses is critical in the diabetes area, especially when in multinational epidemiological studies, 29 because the lack of clinical data may compromise optimal algorithms for patients' and outcomes' iden-…”
Section: Administrative Claims Databases: Validity Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that social isolation due to hearing loss could contribute to the development of AD. There is also the strong possibility that both diseases have a common cause and that hearing loss is simply an early condition indicative of the underlying pathology [6,[43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are guidelines on the reporting of observational studies, 42,43 and these are applicable to the analyses of networks of observational databases, but additional guidance is needed for analyses across networks of observational databases. 44 The same applies to Guidelines on Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practice 45 and the more specific recommendations for pharmacoepidemiology database studies by Hall et al 46 and other guidance on the use of databases for other applications such as Comparable Effectiveness Research. 47,48 While the area of networked observational data analysis across decentralized networks of data is novel, there has been extensive research and guidelines in more matured research fields looking at how to conduct analysis across multiple datasets without necessarily having access to patient-level data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By comparison, there is unsurprisingly, given the newness of the field, a very limited guidance literature on the use of distributed noncentralized networks of observational databases. There are guidelines on the reporting of observational studies, and these are applicable to the analyses of networks of observational databases, but additional guidance is needed for analyses across networks of observational databases . The same applies to Guidelines on Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practice and the more specific recommendations for pharmacoepidemiology database studies by Hall et al and other guidance on the use of databases for other applications such as Comparable Effectiveness Research …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%