2017
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidance on the risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission to EFSA, the EFSA Scientific Committee (SC) prepared a guidance for the risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age. In its approach to develop this guidance, the EFSA SC took into account, among others, (i) an exposure assessment based on infant formula as the only source of nutrition; (ii) knowledge of organ development in human infants, including the development of the gut, metabolic and excretory capacities, the b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 266 publications
(388 reference statements)
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Panel noted that in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, use levels of mono‐ and di‐glycerides of fatty acids (E 471) in food for infants under the age of 12 weeks are included in category 13.1.1, 13.1.5.1 and 13.1.5.2. The Panel considered that these uses for infants under the age of 12 weeks would require a specific risk assessment in line with the recommendations given by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) (1978), the SCF () and EFSA (EFSA Scientific Committee, ). Therefore, the current re‐evaluation of mono‐ and di‐glycerides of fatty acids (E 471) as a food additive is not applicable for infants under the age of 12 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Panel noted that in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008, use levels of mono‐ and di‐glycerides of fatty acids (E 471) in food for infants under the age of 12 weeks are included in category 13.1.1, 13.1.5.1 and 13.1.5.2. The Panel considered that these uses for infants under the age of 12 weeks would require a specific risk assessment in line with the recommendations given by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) (1978), the SCF () and EFSA (EFSA Scientific Committee, ). Therefore, the current re‐evaluation of mono‐ and di‐glycerides of fatty acids (E 471) as a food additive is not applicable for infants under the age of 12 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the definition above, the ADI as established for the general population does not apply to infants below 12 weeks of age (JECFA, ; SCF, ). In this context, the re‐evaluation of the use of food additives in food for infants below 12 weeks represents a special case for which specific recommendations were given by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) (JECFA, , ), by the SCF (SCF, , ) and EFSA (EFSA Scientific Committee, ). The Panel endorsed these recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On 31 May 2017, EFSA published a guidance document on the risk assessment of substances present in food intended for infants below 16 weeks of age enabling EFSA to assess the safety of food additives used in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2017). Therefore, the current evaluation addresses all population groups, including the infants below 12 or 16 weeks of age following the principles outlined in that guidance.…”
Section: Methodsologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ADI as established for the general population does not directly apply to infants below 12 weeks of age (JECFA, 1978;SCF, 1998a). In this context, the re-evaluation of the use of food additives in food for infants below 12 weeks represents a special case for which specific recommendations were given by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) (JECFA, 1972(JECFA, , 1978 and by the SCF (SCF, 1996(SCF, , 1998a and EFSA (EFSA Scientific Committee, 2017). The Panel endorsed these recommendations.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Terms Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%