Guidance on the renewal of the authorisation of feed additives

Additives, Efsa Panel on; Bampidis, Vasileios; Azimonti, Giovanna; Bastos, Maria de Lourdes; Dusemund, Birgit; Durjava, Mojca Fašmon; Kouba, Maryline; López‐Alonso, Marta; Puente, Secundino López; Marcon, Francesca; Mayo, Baltasar; Pechová, Alena; Petkova, Mariana; Ramos, Fernando; Sanz, Yolanda; Villa, Roberto Edoardo; Woutersen, Ruud; Anguita, Montserrat; Galobart, Jaume; Guajardo, Irene Muñoz; Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo

doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6340

Cited by 49 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The approach followed by the FEEDAP Panel to assess the safety and the efficacy of Naringin is in line with the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 429/2008 6 and the relevant guidance documents: Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers (EFSA FEEDAP PANEL, 2012), Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2017 ) and Guidance on the renewal of the authorisation of feed additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2021a ).…”

Section: Data and Methodologiessupporting

confidence: 62%

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of naringin for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (HealthTech Bio Actives, S.L.U. (HTBA))

Bampidis¹,

Azimonti²,

Bastos³

et al. 2022

EFS2

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for the renewal of authorisation of naringin as a sensory additive for all animal species. The applicant provided data demonstrating that the additive currently in the market complies with the conditions of authorisation. The FEEDAP Panel confirms that the use of naringin under the current authorised conditions of use is safe for the target species, the consumers and the environment. Naringin does not cause severe irritation or corrosion to eyes, is not irritant to the skin and is not classified as a dermal sensitiser. The FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the possible respiratory sensitisation of the additive, due to the lack of data. There was no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

show abstract

Section: Data and Methodologiessupporting

confidence: 62%

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of naringin for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (HealthTech Bio Actives, S.L.U. (HTBA))

Bampidis¹,

Azimonti²,

Bastos³

et al. 2022

EFS2

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The approach followed by the FEEDAP Panel to assess the safety and the efficacy of L. plantarum NCIMB 30236 is in line with the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 429/2008 6 and the relevant guidance documents: Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2018) and Guidance on the renewal of the authorisation of feed additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2021).…”

Section: Data and Methodologiesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly Lactobacillus plantarum) NCIMB 30236 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (BioCC OÜ)

Bampidis¹,

Azimonti²,

Bastos³

et al. 2022

EFS2

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly Lactobacillus plantarum) NCIMB 30236 as a technological additive for use in forage for all animal species. The additive aims at improving the production of silage and is currently authorised for all animal species. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There was no new evidence to lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumers and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. Regarding user safety, the additive should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. No conclusions can be drawn on the eye and skin irritancy potential of the additive. There was no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

show abstract

“…The approach followed by the FEEDAP Panel to assess the safety of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 23376 is in line with the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 429/20089 and the relevant guidance documents: Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012b), Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2018) and Guidance on the renewal of the authorisation of feed additives (EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2021).…”

Section: Data and Methodologiesmentioning

confidence: 53%

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 23376 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Agri‐King, Inc.)

Bampidis¹,

Azimonti²,

Bastos³

et al. 2023

EFS2

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 23376, as a technological additive to improve ensiling of forage for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There is no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concludes that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumers and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. Regarding user safety, the additive is not irritant to skin or eyes but owing to its proteinaceous nature, it should be considered a respiratory sensitiser. No conclusions can be drawn on the skin sensitisation potential of the additive. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

show abstract

Guidance on the renewal of the authorisation of feed additives

Cited by 49 publications

References 14 publications

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of naringin for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (HealthTech Bio Actives, S.L.U. (HTBA))

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of naringin for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (HealthTech Bio Actives, S.L.U. (HTBA))

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (formerly Lactobacillus plantarum) NCIMB 30236 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (BioCC OÜ)

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 23376 for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (Agri‐King, Inc.)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About