2015
DOI: 10.5672/fc.2173-9218.(2015/vol7).001.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guía clínica para el manejo de la faringoamigdalitis aguda del adulto

Abstract: RESUMENLa faringoamigdalitis aguda (FAA) en el adulto es una de las enfermedades infecciosas más comunes en la consulta del médico de familia. La etiología más frecuente es viral. Dentro de la etiología bacteriana, el principal agente responsable es Streptococcus pyogenes o estreptococo β-hemolítico del grupo A (EBHGA), causante del 5-30% de los casos. En el manejo diagnóstico las escalas de valoración clínica, para predecir la posible etiología bacteriana, son una buena ayuda para seleccionar a qué pacientes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 gives an overview of these guidelines by region and country; Figure 1 shows their origin on a world map. The highest number of guidelines were published in Europe; in addition to a European guideline, 23 a selection of the most recent and relevant published guidelines from Central (Germany), 24 Eastern (Russian Federation), 25 Northern (Netherlands 26 and Sweden 27 ), Southern (Italy 28 and Spain 29 ) and Western countries (France 30 and United Kingdom 31 ) were included. Of a large number, the most recent and relevant published guidelines were selected from North America, including Canada, 32 Mexico 33,34 and the USA 35‐37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 gives an overview of these guidelines by region and country; Figure 1 shows their origin on a world map. The highest number of guidelines were published in Europe; in addition to a European guideline, 23 a selection of the most recent and relevant published guidelines from Central (Germany), 24 Eastern (Russian Federation), 25 Northern (Netherlands 26 and Sweden 27 ), Southern (Italy 28 and Spain 29 ) and Western countries (France 30 and United Kingdom 31 ) were included. Of a large number, the most recent and relevant published guidelines were selected from North America, including Canada, 32 Mexico 33,34 and the USA 35‐37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 33 of the 36 guidelines provide recommendations regarding antibiotics, only 20 discuss other sore throat treatments. Of these 20 guidelines, 11 recommend paracetamol and non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the treatment of fever and pain, four recommend only NSAIDs, 32,46,29,25 one recommends only paracetamol 52 and one advises against the standard use of NSAIDs, because of their potential systemic side effects 26 . Furthermore, four guidelines recommend topical treatments such as lozenges, gargles or sprays for analgesic treatment 42,49,34,31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Above all, the results of this study suggest that performing RADT is especially important when the physician's interpretation based on clinical presentation is classified as diagnostic doubt or probably bacterial, as supported by different studies. 7,[12][13] Furthermore, most of the European guidelines for sore throat suggest that RADT should be performed if Centor Score or modified Centor Score ≥3 12 while others recommend RADT when Centor Score or modified Centor Score ≥2. 7,14 In addition, having a negative result on RADT can reassure the patient that antibiotics are not needed, thus decreasing the number of visits to healthcare facilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%