Guerrillas and authoritarians: Partners in post-war polarization

Abstract

Despite a violent and extremist past, some armed rebel movements often abandon their arms and successfully contest power through elections. This paper seeks to understand the environmental factors that determine an insurgent successor party’s electoral success. Using first a cross-national analysis of insurgent successor party performance and then a subnational analysis of Salvadoran elections from 1994–2019, it is shown that the party’s ability to leverage identities forged during the war and organize its appeals along a highly polarized pro- and anti-government axis is crucial to electoral success. This is understood as an organizational capability, the capacity to oppose. At the national level, the existence of an authoritarian successor party increases the longevity of such polarization while subnationally levels of violence help to solidify the wartime cleavage as the most important for local politics.

The partisan consequences of liberation mentality: Ruling party support in Zimbabwe across space and time

“…Aside from party-state fusion, dominant ruling parties that emerged from extraordinary events also typically experienced powerful branding effects that generate significant popular support (Lupu, 2016). Parties built during civil war continue to rely on such ideological branding long after the war is over (Turner, 2020).…”