2018
DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guardianship for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Accountant, Advocate or ‘Family’ Member?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not easy for adults with ID who are assigned a guardian to balance their need for support and protection and their right to self-determination and autonomy. 36 , 37 Most importantly, parents should create alternatives to guardianship instead of making decisions for them. 38 Parents should consult with practitioners, who could suggest best practices for parents and adult children with ID to reduce the risk of COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not easy for adults with ID who are assigned a guardian to balance their need for support and protection and their right to self-determination and autonomy. 36 , 37 Most importantly, parents should create alternatives to guardianship instead of making decisions for them. 38 Parents should consult with practitioners, who could suggest best practices for parents and adult children with ID to reduce the risk of COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persons with a reduced decision-making capacity can have different forms of guardians to help manage finances, through regular visits pay attention to their needs, and safeguard their interests in relation to the law. However, these interventions are in practice uncommon among older people with dementia (Giertz 2018;Mattsson and Giertz 2020). Substituted decision-making interventions are furthermore never to be applied in matters of care.…”
Section: Methods and The Swedish Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mentor is not legally obliged to actively involve the principal in the decision-making process. Therefore, despite the legally constructed role of the mentor as an assistant, and despite the formal requirement of consent from the principal, it happens that in practice a mentor can misuse the role and take full control over the principal's affairs, especially in relation to financial matters (Giertz, 2018).…”
Section: Self-determination and Legal Competencementioning
confidence: 99%