2018
DOI: 10.1002/qj.3355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guaranteeing the convergence of the saddle formulation for weakly constrained 4D‐Var data assimilation

Abstract: This paper discusses convergence issues for the saddle variational formulation of the weakly constrained 4D‐Var method in data assimilation, a method whose main interests are its parallelizable nature and its limited use of the inverse of the correlation matrices. It is shown that the method, in its original form, may produce erratic results or diverge because of the inherent lack of monotonicity of the produced objective function values. Convergent, variationally coherent variants of the algorithm are then pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An active research topic in this area is the weak constraint four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data assimilation method. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] It is employed in the search for states of the system over a time period, called the assimilation window. This method uses a cost function that is formulated under the assumption that the numerical model is not perfect and penalizes the weighted discrepancy between the analysis and the observations, the analysis and the background state, and the difference between the analysis and the trajectory given by integrating the dynamical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An active research topic in this area is the weak constraint four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data assimilation method. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] It is employed in the search for states of the system over a time period, called the assimilation window. This method uses a cost function that is formulated under the assumption that the numerical model is not perfect and penalizes the weighted discrepancy between the analysis and the observations, the analysis and the background state, and the difference between the analysis and the trajectory given by integrating the dynamical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should also remember that our analysis merely provides bounds on the conditioning, which are pessimistic by nature, and that the observation term H T R −1 H (which we ignored here) may not always be negligible. The situation is therefore often problem-dependent, as has been demonstrated in Gratton et al (2017b) where very different behaviours (good and bad) were observed for two contrasting data assimilation problems.…”
Section: Application To Weakly Constrained Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While practitioners have been aware of the difficulty for some time (e.g. Fisher and Gürol, ; ; Gratton et al ; T. Janjić and Y. Zhang, Personal communication, 2017), a formal analysis, and hence a complete understanding, has been missing so far. A first step in this direction was made by Braess and Peisker (), where they showed (in a slighly different context) that, if A is square, symmetric and positive‐definite, and if W is the identity matrix, then preconditioning A 2 (which corresponds to unweighted symmetric least‐squares) using the square of an approximation of A as a preconditioner might lead to a situation worse than not preconditioning at all, unless A and its preconditioner commute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatial parallelization of variational DA techniques has long been considered (e.g., Trémolet and Dimet, ; Rantakokko, ; Elbern and Schmidt, ). Moreover, methods have been developed to exploit time parallelism in 4D‐Var through subdivision of the assimilation time window (Rao and Sandu, ) or through the saddle‐point formulation in the weak‐constraint algorithm (Fisher and Gürol, ), although the convergence of the latter cannot always be guaranteed (Gratton et al ., ). Most recently, Mercier et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%